Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 5;133(17):2054-2060.
doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000001058.

Factors associated with the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment

Xiao-Ying Jin  1   2 , Chao Li  1 , Wen Xu  1 , Liu Liu  1 , Min-Ling Wei  1 , Hai-Yi Fei  1 , Jing Li  1 , Feng Zhou  1 , Song-Ying Zhang  1   2
Affiliations

Factors associated with the incidence of ectopic pregnancy in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment

Xiao-Ying Jin et al. Chin Med J (Engl). .

Abstract

Background: Ectopic pregnancy (EP) is a common complication in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment, but the underlying causes for this remain unclear. This study aimed to explore factors affecting the incidence of EP in in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

Methods: This was a retrospective study on the incidence of EP in IVF/ICSI cycles between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017. Patient age, infertility diagnosis (tubal factor or not), primary or secondary infertility, type of cycle (frozen-thawed or fresh), type of embryo(s) transferred (cleavage embryo or blastocyst), number of embryos transferred (one, two, or three), previous history of EP, and endometrial combined thickness were analyzed to explore their relationships with the incidence of EP. Based on clinical typing results, the patients were divided into an EP group or a non-EP group. Categorical variables were analyzed using Chi-squared test or Fisher exact test. Logistic regression analysis was performed to explore their associations with the incidence of EP.

Results: The percentage of patients with primary infertility in EP group was significantly lower than that in non-EP group (31.3% vs. 46.7%, χ = 26.032, P < 0.001). The percentage of patients with tubal infertility in EP group was also significantly higher than that in non-EP group (89.2% vs. 63.6%, χ = 77.410, P < 0.001). The percentages of patients with transfer of cleavage-stage embryo or blastocyst (91.4% vs. 84.4%, χ = 10.132, P = 0.001) and different endometrial combined thickness (ECT) (χ = 18.373, P < 0.001) differed significantly between EP and non-EP groups. For patients who had a previous history of one to four EPs, the percentage of patients undergoing transfer of a cleavage-stage embryo was significantly higher in EP group than that in non-EP group (92.2% vs. 77.6%, χ = 13.737, P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, tubal infertility was strongly associated with EP (adjusted odds ratio: 3.995, 95% confidence interval: 2.706-5.897, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: In IVF/ICSI cycles, transfer of a blastocyst-stage embryo, especially for patients with a previous history of EP, reduced the rate of EP. Tubal infertility was strongly associated with EP.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Outline of the selection process for the cycles included in the study. EP: Ectopic pregnancy; ET: Embryo transfer; ICSI: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF: In vitro fertilization.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Clayton HB, Schieve LA, Peterson HB, Jamieson DJ, Reynolds MA, Wright VC. Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology precedures. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107:595–604.. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000196503.78126.62. - PubMed
    1. Perkins KM, Boulet SL, Kissin DM, Jamieson DJ. National ART Surveillance (NASS) Group. Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001–2011. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125:70–78.. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000584. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Refaat B, Dalton E, Ledger WL. Ectopic pregnancy secondary to in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: pathogenic mechanisms and management strategies. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2015; 13:30.doi: 10.1186/s12958-015-0025-0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bu Z, Xiong Y, Wang K, Sun Y. Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproductive technology: a 6-year, single-center study. Fertil Steril 2016; 106:90–94.. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.02.035. - PubMed
    1. Cheng LY, Lin PY, Huang FJ, Kung FT, Chiang HJ, Lin YJ, et al. Ectopic pregnancy following in vitro fertilization with embryo transfer: a single-center experience during 15 years. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 54:541–545.. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2015.08.004. - PubMed