Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Aug 18;17(8):e1003182.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003182. eCollection 2020 Aug.

Changes in parental smoking during pregnancy and risks of adverse birth outcomes and childhood overweight in Europe and North America: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 229,000 singleton births

Elise M Philips  1   2 Susana Santos  1   2 Leonardo Trasande  3   4   5   6   7 Juan J Aurrekoetxea  8   9   10 Henrique Barros  11   12 Andrea von Berg  13 Anna Bergström  14   15 Philippa K Bird  16 Sonia Brescianini  17 Carol Ní Chaoimh  18   19 Marie-Aline Charles  20 Leda Chatzi  21 Cécile Chevrier  22 George P Chrousos  23 Nathalie Costet  22 Rachel Criswell  24   25 Sarah Crozier  26 Merete Eggesbø  27 Maria Pia Fantini  28 Sara Farchi  29 Francesco Forastiere  29 Marleen M H J van Gelder  30   31 Vagelis Georgiu  32 Keith M Godfrey  26   33 Davide Gori  28 Wojciech Hanke  34 Barbara Heude  20 Daniel Hryhorczuk  35 Carmen Iñiguez  10   36 Hazel Inskip  26   33 Anne M Karvonen  37 Louise C Kenny  19   38 Inger Kull  39   40 Debbie A Lawlor  41   42 Irina Lehmann  43 Per Magnus  44 Yannis Manios  45 Erik Melén  14   39   40 Monique Mommers  46 Camilla S Morgen  47   48 George Moschonis  49 Deirdre Murray  19   50 Ellen A Nohr  51 Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen  48 Emily Oken  52 Adriëtte J J M Oostvogels  53 Eleni Papadopoulou  54 Juha Pekkanen  37   55 Costanza Pizzi  56 Kinga Polanska  34 Daniela Porta  29 Lorenzo Richiardi  56 Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman  52 Nel Roeleveld  30 Franca Rusconi  57 Ana C Santos  11   12 Thorkild I A Sørensen  48   58 Marie Standl  59 Camilla Stoltenberg  60   61 Jordi Sunyer  10   62   63 Elisabeth Thiering  59   64 Carel Thijs  46 Maties Torrent  65 Tanja G M Vrijkotte  53 John Wright  66 Oleksandr Zvinchuk  67 Romy Gaillard  1   2 Vincent W V Jaddoe  1   2
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Changes in parental smoking during pregnancy and risks of adverse birth outcomes and childhood overweight in Europe and North America: An individual participant data meta-analysis of 229,000 singleton births

Elise M Philips et al. PLoS Med. .

Abstract

Background: Fetal smoke exposure is a common and key avoidable risk factor for birth complications and seems to influence later risk of overweight. It is unclear whether this increased risk is also present if mothers smoke during the first trimester only or reduce the number of cigarettes during pregnancy, or when only fathers smoke. We aimed to assess the associations of parental smoking during pregnancy, specifically of quitting or reducing smoking and maternal and paternal smoking combined, with preterm birth, small size for gestational age, and childhood overweight.

Methods and findings: We performed an individual participant data meta-analysis among 229,158 families from 28 pregnancy/birth cohorts from Europe and North America. All 28 cohorts had information on maternal smoking, and 16 also had information on paternal smoking. In total, 22 cohorts were population-based, with birth years ranging from 1991 to 2015. The mothers' median age was 30.0 years, and most mothers were medium or highly educated. We used multilevel binary logistic regression models adjusted for maternal and paternal sociodemographic and lifestyle-related characteristics. Compared with nonsmoking mothers, maternal first trimester smoking only was not associated with adverse birth outcomes but was associated with a higher risk of childhood overweight (odds ratio [OR] 1.17 [95% CI 1.02-1.35], P value = 0.030). Children from mothers who continued smoking during pregnancy had higher risks of preterm birth (OR 1.08 [95% CI 1.02-1.15], P value = 0.012), small size for gestational age (OR 2.15 [95% CI 2.07-2.23], P value < 0.001), and childhood overweight (OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.35-1.48], P value < 0.001). Mothers who reduced the number of cigarettes between the first and third trimester, without quitting, still had a higher risk of small size for gestational age. However, the corresponding risk estimates were smaller than for women who continued the same amount of cigarettes throughout pregnancy (OR 1.89 [95% CI 1.52-2.34] instead of OR 2.20 [95% CI 2.02-2.42] when reducing from 5-9 to ≤4 cigarettes/day; OR 2.79 [95% CI 2.39-3.25] and OR 1.93 [95% CI 1.46-2.57] instead of OR 2.95 [95% CI 2.75-3.15] when reducing from ≥10 to 5-9 and ≤4 cigarettes/day, respectively [P values < 0.001]). Reducing the number of cigarettes during pregnancy did not affect the risks of preterm birth and childhood overweight. Among nonsmoking mothers, paternal smoking was associated with childhood overweight (OR 1.21 [95% CI 1.16-1.27], P value < 0.001) but not with adverse birth outcomes. Limitations of this study include the self-report of parental smoking information and the possibility of residual confounding. As this study only included participants from Europe and North America, results need to be carefully interpreted regarding other populations.

Conclusions: We observed that as compared to nonsmoking during pregnancy, quitting smoking in the first trimester is associated with the same risk of preterm birth and small size for gestational age, but with a higher risk of childhood overweight. Reducing the number of cigarettes, without quitting, has limited beneficial effects. Paternal smoking seems to be associated, independently of maternal smoking, with the risk of childhood overweight. Population strategies should focus on parental smoking prevention before or at the start, rather than during, pregnancy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: AvB has received reimbursement for speaking at symposia sponsored by Nestlé and Mead Johnson, who partly financially supported the 15-year follow-up examination of the GINIplus study. KMG has received reimbursement for speaking at conferences sponsored by companies selling nutritional products and is part of an academic consortium that has received research funding from Abbott Nutrition, Nestec, and Danone. DAL has received support from Roche Diagnostics and Medtronic in relation to biomarker research that is not related to the research presented in this paper. The other authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flowchart of the cohorts and participants.
BMI, body mass index.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Maternal smoking with risks of preterm birth assessed by 2-stage random-effects models.
(A) First trimester smoking versus nonsmoking, (B) continued smoking versus nonsmoking. Values are odds ratios (95% CIs) per cohort and pooled from binary logistic regression models that reflect the risk of preterm birth per smoking pattern (first-trimester-only smoking or continued smoking) compared to that of nonsmoking. Models are adjusted for maternal age, educational level, parity, prepregnancy or early-pregnancy body mass index, alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and paternal smoking. The cohorts for which no estimate was provided had no data available for that particular analysis. The heterogeneity between the estimates of each cohort was 0% (95% CI 0%–57%) and 4% (95% CI 0%–47%) for first-trimester-only smoking and continued smoking, respectively. CI, confidence interval, IV, instrumental variable.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Maternal smoking with risks of small size for gestational age assessed by two-stage random-effects models.
(A) First trimester smoking versus nonsmoking, (B) continued smoking versus nonsmoking. Values are odds ratios (95% CIs) per cohort and pooled from binary logistic regression models that reflect the risk of small size for gestational age per smoking pattern (first-trimester-only smoking or continued smoking) compared to that of nonsmoking. Models are adjusted for maternal age, educational level, parity, prepregnancy or early-pregnancy body mass index, alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and paternal smoking. The cohorts for which no estimate was provided had no data available for that particular analysis. The heterogeneity between the estimates of each cohort was 21% (95% CI 0%–65%) and 75% (95% CI 56%–86%) for first-trimester-only smoking and continued smoking, respectively. CI, confidence interval, IV, instrumental variable.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Maternal smoking with risks of childhood overweight assessed by two-stage random-effects models.
(A) First trimester smoking versus nonsmoking, (B) continued smoking versus nonsmoking. Values are odds ratios (95% CIs) per cohort and pooled from binary logistic regression models that reflect the risk of childhood overweight per smoking pattern (first-trimester-only smoking or continued smoking) compared to that of nonsmoking. Models are adjusted for maternal age, educational level, parity, prepregnancy or early-pregnancy body mass index, alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and paternal smoking. The cohorts for which no estimate was provided had no data available for that particular analysis. The heterogeneity between the estimates of each cohort was 0% (95% CI 0%–60%) and 47% (95% CI 1%–72%) for first-trimester-only smoking and continued smoking, respectively. CI, confidence interval, IV, instrumental variable.

Comment in

References

    1. Samet JM, Yoon SY. Women and the tobacco epidemic: challenges for the 21st century. Canada: The World Health Organization, in collaboration with the Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins School of Public Health; 2001.
    1. Lange S, Probst C, Rehm J, Popova S. National, regional, and global prevalence of smoking during pregnancy in the general population: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2018;6: e769–e776. 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30223-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cnattingius S. The epidemiology of smoking during pregnancy: smoking prevalence, maternal characteristics, and pregnancy outcomes. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004;6 Suppl 2: S125–140. - PubMed
    1. Hackshaw A, Rodeck C, Boniface S. Maternal smoking in pregnancy and birth defects: a systematic review based on 173 687 malformed cases and 11.7 million controls. Hum Reprod Update. 2011;17: 589–604. 10.1093/humupd/dmr022 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marufu TC, Ahankari A, Coleman T, Lewis S. Maternal smoking and the risk of still birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health. 2015;15: 239 10.1186/s12889-015-1552-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms