Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 18;10(1):13944.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70669-9.

Lipoarabinomannan antigenic epitope differences in tuberculosis disease subtypes

Affiliations

Lipoarabinomannan antigenic epitope differences in tuberculosis disease subtypes

Ruben Magni et al. Sci Rep. .

Erratum in

  • Author Correction: Lipoarabinomannan antigenic epitope differences in tuberculosis disease subtypes.
    Magni R, Rruga F, Alsaab FM, Sharif S, Howard M, Espina V, Kim B, Lepene B, Lee G, Alayouni MA, Steinberg H, Araujo R, Kashanchi F, Riccardi F, Morreira S, Araujo A, Poli F, Jaganath D, Semitala FC, Worodria W, Andama A, Choudhary A, Honnen WJ, Petricoin EF 3rd, Cattamanchi A, Colombatti R, de Waard JH, Oberhelman R, Pinter A, Gilman RH, Liotta LA, Luchini A. Magni R, et al. Sci Rep. 2021 Sep 27;11(1):19546. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-98304-1. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34580341 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

An accurate urine test for diverse populations with active tuberculosis could be transformative for preventing TB deaths. Urinary liporabinomannan (LAM) testing has been previously restricted to HIV co-infected TB patients. In this study we evaluate urinary LAM in HIV negative, pediatric and adult, pulmonary and extrapulmonary tuberculosis patients. We measured 430 microbiologically confirmed pretreatment tuberculosis patients and controls from Peru, Guinea Bissau, Venezuela, Uganda and the United States using three monoclonal antibodies, MoAb1, CS35, and A194, which recognize distinct LAM epitopes, a one-sided immunoassay, and blinded cohorts. We evaluated sources of assay variability and comorbidities (HIV and diabetes). All antibodies successfully discriminated TB positive from TB negative patients. ROAUC from the average of three antibodies' responses was 0.90; 95% CI 0.87-0.93, 90% sensitivity, 73.5% specificity (80 pg/mL). MoAb1, recognizing the 5-methylthio-D-xylofuranose(MTX)-mannose(Man) cap epitope, performed the best, was less influenced by glycosuria and identified culture positive pediatric (N = 19) and extrapulmonary (N = 24) patients with high accuracy (ROAUC 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.98, 0.90 sensitivity 0.80 specificity at 80 pg/mL; ROAUC = 0.96, 95% CI 0.92-0.99, 96% sensitivity, 80% specificity at 82 pg/mL, respectively). The MoAb1 antibody, recognizing the MTX-Man cap epitope, is a novel analyte for active TB detection in pediatric and extrapulmonary disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LAL, AL, and EFP are inventors on patents US9012240 and US8497137 related to the affinity particles, and AP and AC are inventors on a pending patent describing the A194 antibody. Ceres Nanosciences (Nanotrap) licensed the technology from George Mason University Research Foundation. LAL, EFP and AL own shares of Ceres Nanosciences. B.L., B.K. are Ceres Nanosciences’ employees who manufactured some reagents for this study. The other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristics of LAM immunoassays. (A) Monoclonal antibodies CS-35, A194 and MoAb1 recognize different LAM epitopes. Structural epitope configurations adapted from Sigal et al., Amin et al., and De et al.. (B) Calibration curve of anti-LAM antibodies. Analytical measurement range for CS35, MoAb1, and A194 was 0.6–4 ng/mL in urine samples without dilution or concentration. (C) Example images show different mAb reactivity to the same urine sample cropped from different blots (Supplementary Figure S1).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Urinary LAM discriminates TB positive from TB negative patients with high accuracy. (A) In a geographically diverse cohort (N = 430), urinary LAM concentration discriminates between cases and controls (Kruskal Wallis p = 8E−37, p = 5E−27, p = 6E−34, for MoAb1, CS35, A194 respectively). (B) Urinary LAM levels are higher in HIV+/TB+ patients than in HIV−/TB+ patients (Kruskal Wallis p = 5E−05, p = 0.002 for CS35 and A194, respectively). (C) Urinary LAM distinguishes microbiologically confirmed untreated TB positives from TB negatives with 90% sensitivity and 70% specificity, at a threshold of 80 pg/mL. (D) Urinary LAM antigenicity varies across samples. 57% of patients yield a signal for all three antibodies, whereas 95% of patients yield a signal to at least one antibody (cut-off 0.080 ng/mL).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Urinalysis and geographical diversity influence LAM values. (A) Abnormal urine values were noted in both controls and TB positive patients. (B) Median urinary LAM concentration varies across different geographic areas (independent sample median test p = 0.030, pairwise comparison in Supplementary Figure S4). Assuming no collection and storage bias, this might be caused by different levels of disease severity at diagnosis, since access to healthcare might be delayed to a greater degree in certain countries. (C) Urinary LAM values were lower in TB patients with glycosuria (n = 22) when measured using CS-35 (p = 0.015) and A194 (p = 0.035).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Urinary LAM is present at detectable concentrations in extrapulmonary adult TB patients and in microbiologically confirmed pediatric TB patients. (A) Levels of urinary LAM as measured using MoAb1 are significantly higher in extrapulmonary patients with respect to pulmonary patients. (B) MoAb1 is superior in discriminating extrapulmonary patients from non TB controls. (C) Levels of urinary LAM measured using CS35 are lower in TB positive pediatric patients than in TB positive adults. (D) ROC analysis demonstrated that MoAb1 was superior to the other antibodies in discriminating pediatric TB patients from negative controls.

References

    1. Noubiap JJ, et al. Global prevalence of diabetes in active tuberculosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of data from 2·3 million patients with tuberculosis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2019;7:e448–e460. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30487-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tuberculosis (TB). https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tuberculosis.
    1. Joel DR, et al. Diagnosis of paediatric tuberculosis using sputum induction in Botswana: Programme description and findings. Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 2014;18:328–334. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.13.0243. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swaminathan S, Rekha B. Pediatric tuberculosis: Global overview and challenges. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2010;50:S184–S194. doi: 10.1086/651490. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kerkhoff AD, et al. Diagnostic sensitivity of SILVAMP TB-LAM (FujiLAM) point-of-care urine assay for extra-pulmonary tuberculosis in people living with HIV. Eur. Respir. J. 2020;55:20. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01259-2019. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms