Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020;35(7):e202000702.
doi: 10.1590/s0102-865020200070000002. Epub 2020 Aug 17.

Criteria for assessing peripheral nerve injury. Behavioral and functional assessment in non-operated Wistar rats

Affiliations

Criteria for assessing peripheral nerve injury. Behavioral and functional assessment in non-operated Wistar rats

Renan Kleber Costa Teixeira et al. Acta Cir Bras. 2020.

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate the normality pattern in functional tests of peripheral nerves. Methods Sixty female and sixty male Wistar rats were submitted to vibrissae movement and nictitating reflex for facial nerve; grooming test and grasping test for brachial plexus; and walking tracking test and horizontal ladder test for lumbar plexus. The tests were performed separately, with an interval of seven days between each. Results All animals showed the best score in vibrissae movement, nictitating reflex, grooming test, and horizontal ladder test. The best score was acquired for the first time in more than 90% of animals. The mean of strength on the grasping test was 133.46±12.08g for the right and 121.74±8.73g for the left anterior paw. There was a difference between the right and left sides. There was no difference between the groups according to sex. There is no statistical difference comparing all functional indexes between sex, independent of the side analyzed. The peroneal functional index showed higher levels than the sciatic and tibial functional index on both sides and sex. Conclusions The behavioral and functional assessment of peripheral nerve regeneration are low-cost, easy to perform, and reliable tests. However, they need to be performed by experienced researchers to avoid misinterpretation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: none

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean of functional index tests performed according to sex and laterality.

References

    1. Wojtkiewicz DM, Saunders J, Domeshek L, Novak CB, Kaskutas V, Mackinnon SE. Hand. 2. Vol. 10. N Y: 2015. Social impact of peripheral nerve injuries; pp. 161–167. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sabongi RG, Fernandes M, Dos Santos JB. Peripheral nerve regeneration with conduits: use of vein tubes. 10.4103/1673-5374.155428Neural Regen Res. 2015;10(4):529–533. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Panagopoulos GN, Megaloikonomos PD, Mavrogenis AF. The present and future for peripheral nerve regeneration. 10.3928/01477447-20161019-01Orthopedics. 2017;40(1):e141–e156. - PubMed
    1. Mavrogenis AF, Markatos K, Saranteas T, Ignatiadis I, Spyridonos S, Bumbasirevic M, Georgescu AV, Beris A, Soucacos PN. The history of microsurgery. 10.1007/s00590-019-02378-7Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019;29(2):247–254. - PubMed
    1. Houschyar KS, Momeni A, Pyles MN, Cha JY, Maan ZN, Duscher D, Jew OS, Siemers F, van Schoonhoven J. The role of current techniques and concepts in peripheral nerve repair. 417529310.1155/2016/4175293Plast Surg Int. 2016;2016 - PMC - PubMed