A comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets
- PMID: 3281441
- DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90165-5
A comparison of shear bond strengths of metal and ceramic brackets
Abstract
The study measures and compares shear bond strength data obtained from metal, ceramic, and ceramic-filled plastic brackets bonded to human incisor teeth with a heavily filled composite resin. The mean values for groups of different types of brackets were not statistically significant. The site of failure was commonly at the resin/bracket interface except for the ceramic-filled plastic brackets, which frequently showed failure of the bracket itself. One group of ceramic brackets that used no mechanical retention often showed failure to the extent that the bulk of resin remained on the bracket. The findings strongly suggest that ceramic brackets should offer a viable alternative to their metal counterparts because they combine esthetics with a bond strength that is comparable to and as reliable as their metal counterparts.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets.Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):457-62. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0457:COSBSO>2.3.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1999. PMID: 10515144
-
Effect of light-cured filled sealant on shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded with a resin-modified glass ionomer cement.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Feb;135(2):194-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.024. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009. PMID: 19201326 Clinical Trial.
-
Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces.Eur J Orthod. 2010 Jun;32(3):274-80. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp098. Epub 2009 Nov 10. Eur J Orthod. 2010. PMID: 19903729
-
Dental materials: 1996 literature review. Part 2.J Dent. 1998 May;26(4):273-91. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00064-x. J Dent. 1998. PMID: 9611932 Review.
-
In-house three-dimensional designing and printing customized brackets.J World Fed Orthod. 2022 Dec;11(6):190-196. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2022.10.004. Epub 2022 Nov 5. J World Fed Orthod. 2022. PMID: 36347750 Review.
Cited by
-
In Vitro Evaluation of Experimental Self-Adhesive Orthodontic Composites Used to Bond Ceramic Brackets.Materials (Basel). 2019 Jan 30;12(3):419. doi: 10.3390/ma12030419. Materials (Basel). 2019. PMID: 30704042 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of Different Adhesive Resin Removal Methods after Debonding Ceramic Orthodontic Molar Tubes: A Scanning Electron Microscope Study.Scanning. 2022 Nov 16;2022:4853035. doi: 10.1155/2022/4853035. eCollection 2022. Scanning. 2022. PMID: 36474710 Free PMC article.
-
Debonding of ceramic brackets by Er:YAG laser.J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2016 Apr 1;50(2):24-30. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.39114. eCollection 2016. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2016. PMID: 28955562 Free PMC article.
-
Porous ceramic lamellae for orthodontic ceramic brackets: part I: fabrication and characterization.J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997 Jul;8(7):441-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1018561706818. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1997. PMID: 15348728
-
The Shear Bond Strengths of Metal and Ceramic Brackets: An in-Vitro Comparative Study.J Clin Diagn Res. 2013 Jul;7(7):1495-7. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2013/5435.3172. Epub 2013 Jul 1. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013. PMID: 23998105 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources