Comparative analysis of the biomechanical behavior of two different design metaphyseal-fitting short stems using digital image correlation
- PMID: 32814586
- PMCID: PMC7437017
- DOI: 10.1186/s12938-020-00806-y
Comparative analysis of the biomechanical behavior of two different design metaphyseal-fitting short stems using digital image correlation
Abstract
Background: The progressive evolution in hip replacement research is directed to follow the principles of bone and soft tissue sparing surgery. Regarding hip implants, a renewed interest has been raised towards short uncemented femoral implants. A heterogeneous group of short stems have been designed with the aim to approximate initial, post-implantation bone strain to the preoperative levels in order to minimize the effects of stress shielding. This study aims to investigate the biomechanical properties of two distinctly designed femoral implants, the TRI-LOCK Bone Preservation Stem, a shortened conventional stem and the Minima S Femoral Stem, an even shorter and anatomically shaped stem, based on experiments and numerical simulations. Furthermore, finite element models of implant-bone constructs should be evaluated for their validity against mechanical tests wherever it is possible. In this work, the validation was performed via a direct comparison of the FE calculated strain fields with their experimental equivalents obtained using the digital image correlation technique.
Results: Design differences between Trilock BPS and Minima S femoral stems conditioned different strain pattern distributions. A distally shifting load distribution pattern as a result of implant insertion and also an obvious decrease of strain in the medial proximal aspect of the femur was noted for both stems. Strain changes induced after the implantation of the Trilock BPS stem at the lateral surface were greater compared to the non-implanted femur response, as opposed to those exhibited by the Minima S stem. Linear correlation analyses revealed a reasonable agreement between the numerical and experimental data in the majority of cases.
Conclusion: The study findings support the use of DIC technique as a preclinical evaluation tool of the biomechanical behavior induced by different implants and also identify its potential for experimental FE model validation. Furthermore, a proximal stress-shielding effect was noted after the implantation of both short-stem designs. Design-specific variations in short stems were sufficient to produce dissimilar biomechanical behaviors, although their clinical implication must be investigated through comparative clinical studies.
Keywords: Digital image correlation; Experimental validation; Finite element analysis; Short stem; Total hip arthroplasty.
Conflict of interest statement
This study received research support from the company LimaCorporate S.p.A (Villanova di San Daniele, Italy), which manufactures the Minima S implant. Donation of the femoral implants for testing purposes was supported by LimaCorporate S.p.A, Italy and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. Warsaw, USA. All authors declare that there exists no further conflict of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Comparison of two metaphyseal-fitting (short) femoral stems in primary total hip arthroplasty: study protocol for a prospective randomized clinical trial with additional biomechanical testing and finite element analysis.Trials. 2019 Jun 17;20(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3445-x. Trials. 2019. PMID: 31208433 Free PMC article.
-
Development and in vitro validation of a simplified numerical model for the design of a biomimetic femoral stem.J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Jan;77:539-550. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.019. Epub 2017 Oct 16. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018. PMID: 29069636
-
Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Aug 7;18(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1702-2. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017. PMID: 28784121 Free PMC article.
-
The rationale for short uncemented stems in total hip arthroplasty.Orthop Clin North Am. 2014 Jan;45(1):19-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Oct 10. Orthop Clin North Am. 2014. PMID: 24267204 Review.
-
What role for short stems in 2023?Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Feb;110(1S):103779. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103779. Epub 2023 Nov 29. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 38040113 Review.
Cited by
-
Short-term clinical and radiological results of two different design metaphyseal fitting femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 May 17;16(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02465-8. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 34001204 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of radiographic changes in rectangular curved short stem with thin versus thick porous coating for cementless total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study with a propensity score matching.J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Apr 13;16(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02397-3. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021. PMID: 33849591 Free PMC article.
-
Increased stability of short femoral stem through customized distribution of coefficient of friction in porous coating.Sci Rep. 2024 May 28;14(1):12243. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63077-w. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38806607 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical analysis of a short femoral stem used in revision total hip replacement of a standard femoral stem.Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 15;15(1):1967. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-86108-6. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 39809964 Free PMC article.
-
The 3D-Printed Customized Femoral Short Stem Offers Improved Anatomical Parameters Restoration, Fitness and Biomechanical Performance Compared With Traditional Femoral Stem.Orthop Surg. 2025 Apr;17(4):1220-1229. doi: 10.1111/os.70000. Epub 2025 Feb 19. Orthop Surg. 2025. PMID: 39971715 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical