Ensuring editorial continuity and quality of science during the COVID-19 storm: the ICM experience
- PMID: 32815029
- PMCID: PMC7437641
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-020-06207-y
Ensuring editorial continuity and quality of science during the COVID-19 storm: the ICM experience
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Ensuring editorial continuity and quality of science during the COVID-19 storm: the ICM experience.Intensive Care Med. 2022 Feb;48(2):259. doi: 10.1007/s00134-021-06582-0. Intensive Care Med. 2022. PMID: 34860268 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review?J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013 Dec;113(12):916-20. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2013.070. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013. PMID: 24285034
References
-
- Allen TW. Peer review guidance: how do you write a good review? J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2013;113:916–920. - PubMed
-
- Neto MLR, Almeida HG, Esmeraldo JD, Nobre CB, Pinheiro WR, de Oliveira CRT, Sousa IDC, Lima OMML, Lima NNR, Moreira MM, Lima CKT, Júnior JG, da Silva CGL. When health professionals look death in the eye: the mental health of professionals who deal daily with the 2019 coronavirus outbreak. Psychiatry Res. 2020;288:112972. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112972. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Clarke M (2020) Mike Clarke: How can we avoid research waste during the covid-19 pandemic and plan for the future. BMJ Opin https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/04/21/mike-clarke-avoid-research-waste-co....