Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist
- PMID: 32816740
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2632
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from the Ontario Graduate Scholarship and the University of Ottawa Department of Radiology Research Stipend Programme, Canadian Institute for Health Research, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, and STAndards for Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies group, National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South West Peninsula, Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé, NIHR, and Medical Research Council for the submitted work; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Similar articles
-
Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA).Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 11;8(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1090-9. Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31296260 Free PMC article.
-
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.JAMA. 2018 Jan 23;319(4):388-396. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19163. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 29362800
-
Measuring quality of reporting in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies in medical imaging: comparison of PRISMA-DTA and PRISMA.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Feb;61(2):257-266. doi: 10.1002/uog.26043. Epub 2023 Jan 12. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023. PMID: 36633905
-
Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 10;6(1):194. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0590-8. Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29017574 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;6(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8. Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29258593 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic accuracy of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) in predicting relapses of ANCA-associated vasculitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Rheumatol Int. 2023 Mar;43(3):437-448. doi: 10.1007/s00296-022-05192-3. Epub 2022 Aug 30. Rheumatol Int. 2023. PMID: 36040492
-
The diagnostic accuracy of seven commercial molecular in vitro SARS-CoV-2 detection tests: a rapid meta-analysis.Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2021 Jul;21(7):733-740. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1933449. Epub 2021 Jun 1. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2021. PMID: 34015984 Free PMC article.
-
Brain natriuretic peptide as a biomarker for predicting contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary angiography/intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 30;101(52):e32432. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032432. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022. PMID: 36595981 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Salivary Biomarkers in Detecting Early Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 May 1;23(5):1483-1495. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.5.1483. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022. PMID: 35633529 Free PMC article.
-
Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra versus Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion: A systematic review and comparative meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2022 Jul 11;17(7):e0268483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268483. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35816471 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical