Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 May 23:19:101112.
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101112. eCollection 2020 Sep.

Reversal of voters' positions since the privatization of spirits sales in Washington State

Affiliations

Reversal of voters' positions since the privatization of spirits sales in Washington State

Meenakshi S Subbaraman et al. Prev Med Rep. .

Abstract

In 2011, Washington State voters approved Initiative 1183 (I-1183), the privatization of liquor sales. The aim here was to examine how voter support for privatization has changed since I-1183 passed. Data came from five state-representative surveys, with recruitment between 2014 and 2016 (N = 4,290). Primary outcomes were voting on I-1183 (vs. not), voting for (vs. against) I-1183, and changing vote for I-1183 to against among those who voted for it (vs. not changing). Bivariate and multivariable logistic regressions were used for analyses. Results show that voting for (vs. against) I-1183 was related to 2.59 (P < 0.001) times greater odds of wanting to change one's vote. This difference was large enough to have changed the result of the election if voters could know their later opinions. Among those who voted for I-1183, odds of retracting support were positively related to total past 12-month drink volume. Those who agreed that number of stores selling liquor should decrease were more likely to change votes from for to against, while those who considered that youth alcohol abuse has remained the same since privatization were less likely to change votes. Thus, in the years immediately following liquor privatization in Washington State, public opinion has changed enough to shift the result of the election from supporting privatization to rejecting it. Findings are especially relevant for other US states and countries considering privatization.

Keywords: Alcohol policy; Liquor; Privatization; Spirits; Washington State.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pattison, I. (2019) Ford anxious to unleash alcohol...and Nothern Ontario [Available at: https://www.chroniclejournal.com/opinion/columns/ford-anxious-to-unleash...] The Chronicle Journal: The Newspaper of the Northwest (Thunder Bay, Ontario).
    1. Hanna, M., Seidman, A. (2018) A closer look at school funding in PA governor race: analysis The Inquirer: Daily News (Philadelphia, PA [Accessed 2019-02-04: https://www.philly.com/philly/news/politics/elections/pennsylvania-tom-w...]).
    1. Wolfman-Arent, A. (2018) Wolf calls Wagner's new education funding proposal 'abracadabra math' WITF (Harrisburg, PA [Accessed 2019-02-06: http://www.witf.org/news/2018/08/wolf-calls-wagners-new-education-fundin...]).
    1. The Wilson Times (2018) Our opinion: privatize state's wasteful liquor sales monopoly (Wilson, North Carolina [Accessed 2019-02-04: http://wilsontimes.com/stories/our-opinion-privatize-states-wasteful-abc...]).
    1. The Observer Editorial Board (2018) Why you pay more for booze in North Carolina than you should The Charlotte Observer (Charlotte, NC [Accessed 2019-02-04: https://www.charlotteobserver.com/opinion/editorials/article216603535.html]).

LinkOut - more resources