Management and Outcome of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Transplantation
- PMID: 32818144
- PMCID: PMC7423297
- DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa303
Management and Outcome of Left Ventricular Assist Device Infections in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Transplantation
Abstract
Background: Postoperative management of patients undergoing cardiac transplantation with an infected left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is unclear.
Methods: We retrospectively screened all adults with an LVAD who underwent cardiac transplantation at our institution from 2010 through 2018. We selected all cases of LVAD-specific and LVAD-related infections who were receiving antimicrobial therapy as initial treatment course or chronic suppression at the time of cardiac transplantation. Non-LVAD infections, superficial driveline-infection, or concurrent use of right ventricular assist device or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation device were excluded.
Results: A total of 54 cases met study criteria with 18 of 54 (33.6%) classified as LVAD- specific or related infections and 36 of 54 (66.6%) as noninfected. cases of lvad infection had a higher median charlson comorbidity Index score at the time of transplantation compared with noninfected cases (P = .005). Of the 18 cases of infection, 13 of 18 (72.2%) were classified as LVAD-specific and 5 of 18 (27.8%) were classified as LVAD-related. Nine of 13 (69.2%) cases had proven LVAD-specific infections. Antimicrobial therapy was extended posttransplant to treat preceding LVAD-specific infection in all 9 cases (9 of 13, 69.2%) with a median duration of 14 days (interquartile range, 14-28). After LVAD removal, antimicrobial treatment was not continued for preceding LVAD-related infections.
Conclusions: Patients with an LVAD-specific infection were treated with 2 weeks of pathogen-directed therapy postheart transplant without any relapses. For those without LVAD-specific infection or uncomplicated LVAD-related bacteremia who had completed antimicrobial therapy pretransplant, antibiotics were discontinued after standard perioperative prophylaxis and no relapses were observed.
Keywords: heart transplant; left ventricular device infections; management; outcomes.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.
Figures
References
-
- Mehra MR, Canter CE, Hannan MM, et al. ; International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) Infectious Diseases, Pediatric and Heart Failure and Transplantation Councils The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: a 10-year update. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016; 35:1–23. - PubMed
-
- Benjamin EJ, Muntner P, Alonso A, et al. ; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee Heart disease and stroke statistics-2019 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019; 139:e56–528. - PubMed
-
- Advanced heart failure treated with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device; intrapericardial left ventricular assist device for advanced heart failure; increase in left ventricular assist device thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 697. - PubMed
-
- Miller LW, Pagani FD, Russell SD, et al. ; HeartMate II Clinical Investigators Use of a continuous-flow device in patients awaiting heart transplantation. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:885–96. - PubMed
-
- Pagani FD, Miller LW, Russell SD, et al. . HeartMate II Investigators Extended mechanical circulatory support with a continuous-flow rotary left ventricular assist device. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009; 54:312–21. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
