"Hard" ceramics for "Soft" tissue engineering: Paradox or opportunity?
- PMID: 32818612
- DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.08.014
"Hard" ceramics for "Soft" tissue engineering: Paradox or opportunity?
Abstract
Tissue engineering provides great possibilities to manage tissue damages and injuries in modern medicine. The involvement of hard biocompatible materials in tissue engineering-based therapies for the healing of soft tissue defects has impressively increased over the last few years: in this regard, different types of bioceramics were developed, examined and applied either alone or in combination with polymers to produce composites. Bioactive glasses, carbon nanostructures, and hydroxyapatite nanoparticles are among the most widely-proposed hard materials for treating a broad range of soft tissue damages, from acute and chronic skin wounds to complex injuries of nervous and cardiopulmonary systems. Although being originally developed for use in contact with bone, these substances were also shown to offer excellent key features for repair and regeneration of wounds and "delicate" structures of the body, including improved cell proliferation and differentiation, enhanced angiogenesis, and antibacterial/anti-inflammatory activities. Furthermore, when embedded in a soft matrix, these hard materials can improve the mechanical properties of the implant. They could be applied in various forms and formulations such as fine powders, granules, and micro- or nanofibers. There are some pre-clinical trials in which bioceramics are being utilized for skin wounds; however, some crucial questions should still be addressed before the extensive and safe use of bioceramics in soft tissue healing. For example, defining optimal formulations, dosages, and administration routes remain to be fixed and summarized as standard guidelines in the clinic. This review paper aims at providing a comprehensive picture of the use and potential of bioceramics in treatment, reconstruction, and preservation of soft tissues (skin, cardiovascular and pulmonary systems, peripheral nervous system, gastrointestinal tract, skeletal muscles, and ophthalmic tissues) and critically discusses their pros and cons (e.g., the risk of calcification and ectopic bone formation as well as the local and systemic toxicity) in this regard. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Soft tissues form a big part of the human body and play vital roles in maintaining both structure and function of various organs; however, optimal repair and regeneration of injured soft tissues (e.g., skin, peripheral nerve) still remain a grand challenge in biomedicine. Although polymers were extensively applied to restore the lost or injured soft tissues, the use of bioceramics has the potential to provides new opportunities which are still partially unexplored or at the very beginning. This reviews summarizes the state of the art of bioceramics in this field, highlighting the latest evolutions and the new horizons that can be opened by their use in the context of soft tissue engineering. Existing results and future challenges are discussed in order to provide an up-to-date contribution that is useful to both experienced scientists and early-stage researchers of the biomaterials community.
Keywords: Bioactive glasses; Bioceramics; Carbon nanomaterials; Hydroxyapatite; Tissue repair; Wound healing.
Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest in publishing this work.
Similar articles
-
Bioceramics and Scaffolds: A Winning Combination for Tissue Engineering.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015 Dec 17;3:202. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2015.00202. eCollection 2015. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2015. PMID: 26734605 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Bioceramics for Osteochondral Tissue Engineering and Regeneration.Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1058:53-75. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-76711-6_3. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018. PMID: 29691817 Review.
-
Advances in bioactive glass-containing injectable hydrogel biomaterials for tissue regeneration.Acta Biomater. 2021 Dec;136:1-36. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.09.034. Epub 2021 Sep 23. Acta Biomater. 2021. PMID: 34562661 Review.
-
Silicate bioceramics: from soft tissue regeneration to tumor therapy.J Mater Chem B. 2019 Sep 18;7(36):5449-5460. doi: 10.1039/c9tb01467e. J Mater Chem B. 2019. PMID: 31482927 Review.
-
Additively manufactured Bi-functionalized bioceramics for reconstruction of bone tumor defects.Acta Biomater. 2023 Jan 15;156:234-249. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.08.042. Epub 2022 Aug 24. Acta Biomater. 2023. PMID: 36028198 Review.
Cited by
-
Properties and antibacterial effectiveness of metal-ion doped borate-based bioactive glasses.Future Microbiol. 2025 Mar;20(4):315-331. doi: 10.1080/17460913.2025.2470029. Epub 2025 Mar 13. Future Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 40079871 Review.
-
Evolution in Bone Tissue Regeneration: From Grafts to Innovative Biomaterials.Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Apr 29;26(9):4242. doi: 10.3390/ijms26094242. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID: 40362478 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Osteogenic Potential of Magnesium (Mg)-Doped Multicomponent Bioactive Glass: In Vitro and In Vivo Animal Studies.Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 3;15(1):318. doi: 10.3390/ma15010318. Materials (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35009464 Free PMC article.
-
Multidimensional advances in neural interface technology for peripheral nerve repair: From material innovation to clinical translation.Mater Today Bio. 2025 Jul 14;34:102092. doi: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102092. eCollection 2025 Oct. Mater Today Bio. 2025. PMID: 40727303 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Interaction of Ceramic Implant Materials with Immune System.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Feb 20;24(4):4200. doi: 10.3390/ijms24044200. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 36835610 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous