Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 20;11(1):3635.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-17374-3.

Polygenic background modifies penetrance of monogenic variants for tier 1 genomic conditions

Affiliations

Polygenic background modifies penetrance of monogenic variants for tier 1 genomic conditions

Akl C Fahed et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Genetic variation can predispose to disease both through (i) monogenic risk variants that disrupt a physiologic pathway with large effect on disease and (ii) polygenic risk that involves many variants of small effect in different pathways. Few studies have explored the interplay between monogenic and polygenic risk. Here, we study 80,928 individuals to examine whether polygenic background can modify penetrance of disease in tier 1 genomic conditions - familial hypercholesterolemia, hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, and Lynch syndrome. Among carriers of a monogenic risk variant, we estimate substantial gradients in disease risk based on polygenic background - the probability of disease by age 75 years ranged from 17% to 78% for coronary artery disease, 13% to 76% for breast cancer, and 11% to 80% for colon cancer. We propose that accounting for polygenic background is likely to increase accuracy of risk estimation for individuals who inherit a monogenic risk variant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

A.C.F. is a consultant and holds equity in Goodpath. J.R.H., C.L.N., C.L., and A.Y.Z. are employees of Color Genomics. A.P. is a Venture Partner at GV, a subsidiary of Alphabet Corporation. P.T.E. is supported by a grant from Bayer AG to the Broad Institute focused on the genetics and therapeutics of cardiovascular diseases, and has served on advisory boards or consulted for Bayer AG, Quest Diagnostics, and Novartis. K.N. is an employee of IBM Research. E.S.L. serves on the Board of Directors for Codiak; serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of F-Prime Capital Partners and Third Rock Ventures; serves on the Board of Directors of the Innocence Project, Count Me In, and Biden Cancer Initiative; and serves on the Board of Trustees for the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy. S.K. is an employee of Verve Therapeutics, and holds equity in Verve Therapeutics, Maze Therapeutics, Catabasis, and San Therapeutics. He is a member of the scientific advisory boards for Regeneron Genetics Center and Corvidia Therapeutics; he has served as a consultant for Acceleron, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Novo Ventures, Ionis, Alnylam, Aegerion, Haug Partners, Noble Insights, Leerink Partners, Bayer Healthcare, Illumina, Color Genomics, MedGenome, Quest, and Medscape; he reports patents related to a method of identifying and treating a person having a predisposition to or afflicted with cardiometabolic disease (20180010185) and a genetics risk predictor (20190017119). A.V.K. has served as a consultant to Sanofi, Medicines Company, Maze Pharmaceuticals, Navitor Pharmaceuticals, Verve Therapeutics, Amgen, and Color Genomics; received speaking fees from Illumina, the Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research; received sponsored research agreements from the Novartis Institute for Biomedical Research and IBM Research, and reports a patent related to a genetic risk predictor (20190017119). The remaining authors have no disclosures.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Interplay of monogenic and polygenic risk for coronary artery disease.
a Risk of coronary artery disease by monogenic and polygenic risk strata (case-control study; n = 12,852). Carriers and noncarriers were stratified into three groups according to their polygenic score—low, intermediate, or high defined as the lowest quintile, the middle three quintiles, and the highest quintile of the polygenic score distribution, respectively. The odds ratio was assessed in a logistic regression model with age, sex, and the first four principal components of ancestry as covariates. Noncarriers with intermediate polygenic score served as the reference group. The black boxes indicate the adjusted odds ratio. The horizontal lines around the black boxes indicate the 95% confidence intervals. b Predicted odds ratio for coronary artery disease in each percentile (dots) of the polygenic score distribution for carriers (blue) and noncarriers (black) of familial hypercholesterolemia variants in the cohort study derived from the UK Biobank (n = 48,812). Noncarriers with median polygenic score served as the reference group. c Predicted probability of coronary artery disease by age 75 years in each percentile (dots) of the polygenic score distribution for carriers (blue) and noncarriers (black) of familial hypercholesterolemia variants in the cohort study derived from the UK Biobank (n = 48,812). The shaded area around the dots represents the 95% confidence interval. The horizontal dashed lines show the probability of disease for people with average polygenic risk score. FH familial hypercholesterolemia. p-values in the figure were estimated by the Wald Test. Statistical significance was set at p < .05, and two-sided p values were used.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Interplay of monogenic and polygenic risk for breast cancer.
a Risk of breast cancer by monogenic and polygenic strata (case-control study; n = 19,264). Carriers and noncarriers were stratified into three groups according to their polygenic score—low, intermediate, or high defined as the lowest quintile, the middle three quintiles, and the highest quintile of the polygenic score distribution, respectively. The odds ratio was assessed in a logistic regression model with age and the first four principal components of ancestry as covariates. Noncarriers with intermediate polygenic score served as the reference group. The black boxes indicate the adjusted odds ratio. The horizontal lines around the black boxes indicate the 95% confidence intervals. b Predicted odds ratio for breast cancer in each percentile (dots) of the polygenic score distribution for carriers (blue) and noncarriers (black) of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer variants in the cohort study derived from the UK Biobank (n = 26,597). Noncarriers with median polygenic score served as the reference group. c Predicted probability of coronary artery disease by age 75 years in each percentile (dots) of the polygenic score distribution for carriers (blue) and noncarriers (black) of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer variants in the cohort study derived from the UK Biobank (n = 26,597). The shaded area around the dots represents the 95% confidence interval. The horizontal dashed lines show the probability of disease for people with average polygenic risk score. HBOC hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. p-values in the figure were estimated by the Wald Test. Statistical significance was set at p < .05, and two-sided p values were used.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Interplay of monogenic and polygenic risk for colorectal cancer.
a Predicted odds ratio for colorectal cancer in each percentile (dots) of the polygenic score distribution for carriers (blue) and noncarriers (black) of Lynch syndrome variants in the cohort study derived from the UK Biobank (n = 48,812). Noncarriers with median polygenic score served as the reference group. b Predicted probability of colorectal cancer by age 75 years in each percentile (dots) of the polygenic score distribution for carriers (blue) and noncarriers (black) of Lynch syndrome variants in the cohort study derived from the UK Biobank (n = 48,812). The shaded area around the dots represents the 95% confidence interval. The horizontal dashed lines show the probability of disease for people with average polygenic risk score.

Similar articles

  • Monogenic and Polygenic Models of Coronary Artery Disease.
    Muse ED, Chen SF, Torkamani A. Muse ED, et al. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021 Jul 1;23(8):107. doi: 10.1007/s11886-021-01540-0. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021. PMID: 34196841 Free PMC article. Review.
  • Polygenic predisposition to breast cancer and the risk of coronary artery disease.
    D'Souza M, Schou M, Skals R, Weeke PE, Lee C, Smedegaard L, Madelaire C, Gerds TA, Poulsen HE, Hansen T, Grarup N, Pedersen O, Stender S, Engstrøm T, Fosbøl E, Nielsen D, Gislason G, Køber L, Torp-Pedersen C, Andersson C. D'Souza M, et al. Int J Cardiol. 2019 Sep 15;291:145-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.05.051. Epub 2019 May 24. Int J Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31155334
  • Polygenic risk alters the penetrance of monogenic kidney disease.
    Khan A, Shang N, Nestor JG, Weng C, Hripcsak G, Harris PC, Gharavi AG, Kiryluk K. Khan A, et al. Nat Commun. 2023 Dec 14;14(1):8318. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43878-9. Nat Commun. 2023. PMID: 38097619 Free PMC article.
  • Determinants of penetrance and variable expressivity in monogenic metabolic conditions across 77,184 exomes.
    Goodrich JK, Singer-Berk M, Son R, Sveden A, Wood J, England E, Cole JB, Weisburd B, Watts N, Caulkins L, Dornbos P, Koesterer R, Zappala Z, Zhang H, Maloney KA, Dahl A, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Atzmon G, Barajas-Olmos F, Barzilai N, Blangero J, Boerwinkle E, Bonnycastle LL, Bottinger E, Bowden DW, Centeno-Cruz F, Chambers JC, Chami N, Chan E, Chan J, Cheng CY, Cho YS, Contreras-Cubas C, Córdova E, Correa A, DeFronzo RA, Duggirala R, Dupuis J, Garay-Sevilla ME, García-Ortiz H, Gieger C, Glaser B, González-Villalpando C, Gonzalez ME, Grarup N, Groop L, Gross M, Haiman C, Han S, Hanis CL, Hansen T, Heard-Costa NL, Henderson BE, Hernandez JMM, Hwang MY, Islas-Andrade S, Jørgensen ME, Kang HM, Kim BJ, Kim YJ, Koistinen HA, Kooner JS, Kuusisto J, Kwak SH, Laakso M, Lange L, Lee JY, Lee J, Lehman DM, Linneberg A, Liu J, Loos RJF, Lyssenko V, Ma RCW, Martínez-Hernández A, Meigs JB, Meitinger T, Mendoza-Caamal E, Mohlke KL, Morris AD, Morrison AC, Ng MCY, Nilsson PM, O'Donnell CJ, Orozco L, Palmer CNA, Park KS, Post WS, Pedersen O, Preuss M, Psaty BM, Reiner AP, Revilla-Monsalve C, Rich SS, Rotter JI, Saleheen D, Schurmann C, Sim X, Sladek R, Small KS, So WY, Spector TD, Strauch K, Strom TM, T… See abstract for full author list ➔ Goodrich JK, et al. Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 9;12(1):3505. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23556-4. Nat Commun. 2021. PMID: 34108472 Free PMC article.
  • Genetically transitional disease: a new concept in genomic medicine.
    Yao Q, Gorevic P, Shen B, Gibson G. Yao Q, et al. Trends Genet. 2023 Feb;39(2):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Dec 21. Trends Genet. 2023. PMID: 36564319 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Claussnitzer M, et al. A brief history of human disease genetics. Nature. 2020;577:179–189. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pharoah PDP, Ponder BAJ. Polygenes, risk prediction, and targeted prevention of breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2008;358:2796–2803. - PubMed
    1. The International Schizophrenia Consortium. Common polygenic variation contributes to risk of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Nature. 2009;460:748–752. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kathiresan S, et al. Common variants at 30 loci contribute to polygenic dyslipidemia. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:56–65. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chatterjee N, Shi J, García-Closas M. Developing and evaluating polygenic risk prediction models for stratified disease prevention. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2016;17:392–406. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types