Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;60(6):852-857.
doi: 10.1111/ajo.13241. Epub 2020 Aug 20.

Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: Evolution from medical to surgical management

Caitlin Roche  1 , Rose McDonnell  1 , Paige Tucker  2 , Kym Jones  1 , Kristy Milward  3 , Bernadette McElhinney  1 , Chhaya Mehrotra  1 , Panayiotis Maouris  1
Affiliations
Review

Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: Evolution from medical to surgical management

Caitlin Roche et al. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy (CSP) is defined as blastocyst implantation occurring in a uterine scar. The incidence of CSP continues to rise with increasing caesarean section rates; prevalence is estimated to be 1:1800 to 1:2226 of all pregnancies. To date, over 30 treatment regimens have been published. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines (2016) state there is insufficient evidence to support one specific intervention over another.

Aim: To review outcomes of medical and surgical management of CSP cases at a single tertiary centre over a nine-year period, in order to establish the safest and most effective management approach.

Materials and methods: An audit was undertaken of patients treated for CSP between January 2009 and March 2017 at King Edward Memorial Hospital, Western Australia. Patient demographic and treatment outcome data were extracted from medical records.

Results: Fifty-one patients were identified as having CSP diagnosed during this time period, of which five were excluded due to lack of data, leaving a total of 46 cases. The majority of patients (52%, n = 24) elected for initial surgical management, while 41% (n = 19) trialled medical management. Seven percent (n = 3) opted for conservative management. Success rates of surgical, medical and conservative management were 100%, 53% and 0% respectively (P < 0.001). Medical management was associated with prolonged follow-up; there was no difference in complication rates between surgical and medical managements.

Conclusions: In this audit, surgical management was the most effective way to manage CSP. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the two groups.

Keywords: caesarean section; ectopic; embryo implantation; pregnancy; treatment outcome; ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Seow K, Huang L, Lin Y et al. Cesarean scar pregnancy: issues in management. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2004; 23: 247-253.
    1. Ash A, Smith A, Maxwell D. Caesarean scar pregnancy. BJOG 2007; 114(3): 253-263.
    1. Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B et al. First-trimester diagnosis and management of pregnancies implanted into the lower uterine segment cesarean section scar. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2003; 21: 220-227.
    1. Michener C, Dickinson J. Caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a single centre case series. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009; 49(5): 451-455.
    1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s Mothers and Babies 2015 - In Brief [Internet]. Canberra: AIHW, 2017 [cited 2018 Jan 21]; AIHW Cat no. PER 91. Available from URL https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/mothers-babies/australias-mothers-babies...

Substances