Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;25(33):1900584.
doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.33.1900584.

Do changes in STEC diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in Switzerland? Time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016

Affiliations

Do changes in STEC diagnostics mislead interpretation of disease surveillance data in Switzerland? Time trends in positivity, 2007 to 2016

Fabienne Beatrice Fischer et al. Euro Surveill. 2020 Aug.

Erratum in

  • Erratum for Euro Surveill. 2020;25(33).
    Eurosurveillance editorial team. Eurosurveillance editorial team. Euro Surveill. 2020 Aug;25(34):2008271. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.34.2008271. Euro Surveill. 2020. PMID: 32856587 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

BackgroundLaboratory-confirmed cases of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) have been notifiable to the National Notification System for Infectious Diseases in Switzerland since 1999. Since 2015, a large increase in case numbers has been observed. Around the same time, syndromic multiplex PCR started to replace other diagnostic methods in standard laboratory practice for gastrointestinal pathogen testing, suggesting that the increase in notified cases is due to a change in test practices and numbers.AimThis study examined the impact of changes in diagnostic methods, in particular the introduction of multiplex PCR panels, on routine STEC surveillance data in Switzerland.MethodsWe analysed routine laboratory data from 11 laboratories, which reported 61.9% of all STEC cases from 2007 to 2016 to calculate the positivity, i.e. the rate of the number of positive STEC tests divided by the total number of tests performed.ResultsThe introduction of multiplex PCR had a strong impact on STEC test frequency and identified cases, with the number of tests performed increasing sevenfold from 2007 to 2016. Still, age- and sex-standardised positivity increased from 0.8% in 2007 to 1.7% in 2016.ConclusionIncreasing positivity suggests that the increase in case notifications cannot be attributed to an increase in test numbers alone. Therefore, we cannot exclude a real epidemiological trend for the observed increase. Modernising the notification system to address current gaps in information availability, e.g. diagnostic methods, and improved triangulation of clinical presentation, diagnostic and serotype information are needed to deal with emerging disease and technological advances.

Keywords: STEC/EHEC/VTEC; diagnostics; multiplex PCR; notification system; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of STEC notifications to NNSID versus number of positive STEC tests of 11 diagnostic laboratories, and total number of STEC notifications to NNSID per year, Switzerland, 2007–2016
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total number of STEC tests performed and number of positive tests by test method (A) and by laboratory (B), 11 diagnostic laboratories, Switzerland, 2007–2016
Figure 3
Figure 3
Age- and sex-standardised positivity of STEC testing, 11 diagnostic laboratories, Switzerland, 2007–2016
Figure 4
Figure 4
STEC positivity by laboratory, nine diagnostic laboratoriesa, Switzerland, 2007–2016
Figure 5
Figure 5
Predicted probability for a positive STEC test outcome for the fully adjusted multivariable model and the model excluding adjustment for test method for the complete (A) and reduced (B) dataset, 11 diagnostic laboratories, Switzerland, 2007–2016

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization (WHO). Fact sheet. E. coli. Geneva: WHO. [Accessed 12 Oct 2018]. Available from: http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/e-coli
    1. Tarr PI, Gordon CA, Chandler WL. Shiga-toxin-producing Escherichia coli and haemolytic uraemic syndrome. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1073-86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71144-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chart H. Are all infections with Escherichia coli O157 associated with cattle? Lancet. 1998;352(9133):1005. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)60072-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Grif K, Orth D, Lederer I, Berghold C, Roedl S, Mache CJ, et al. Importance of environmental transmission in cases of EHEC O157 causing hemolytic uremic syndrome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2005;24(4):268-71. 10.1007/s10096-005-1320-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vernozy-Rozand C. Detection of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC) in food. J Appl Microbiol. 1997;82(5):537-51. 10.1111/j.1365-2672.1997.tb03584.x - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources