Biofeedback Rehabilitation and Visual Cortex Response in Stargardt's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- PMID: 32821503
- PMCID: PMC7409294
- DOI: 10.1167/tvst.9.6.6
Biofeedback Rehabilitation and Visual Cortex Response in Stargardt's Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Abstract
Purpose: to evaluate the effect of biofeedback (BF) rehabilitation on the visual function and on the activity of primary visual cortex (PVC) in patients with Stargardt's disease owing to mutations in the ABCA4 gene (STGD1).
Methods: This was a single-center, controlled, randomized study. Twenty-four patients with STGD1 were randomized into two groups: a treatment group (TG) undergoing BF rehabilitation and a control group (CG). Treatment with BF consisted of a 10-minute session per eye performed weekly for 12 weeks. The subjects underwent a baseline and 3-month follow-up visits, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), reading test, microperimetry, and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). The fMRI studies were acquired sequentially using a passive viewing condition and an active reading task. The primary outcomes were the change in the fMRI activation of primary visual cortex and the change in reading ability.
Results: After treatment, the patients in the TG were able to read smaller characters (P = 0.002) with a greater reading speed (P = 0.014) compared with patients in the CG. The fMRI studies showed a significant effect (P < 0.001) of BF on primary visual cortex activation in the TG compared with the CG. Finally, we observed significant (P < 0.05) improvements of best-corrected visual acuity, macular sensitivity, and fixation stability parameters in the TG compared with the CG.
Conclusions: Our study showed that visual rehabilitation using BF improved the usage of residual visual function in patients with STGD1.
Translational relevance: Our findings show that the BF treatment compared with no treatment at all resulted in benefits. The specificity of the treatment could be examined to determine whether BF can be included in clinical practice.
Keywords: Stargardt disease; biofeedback; visual cortex; visual rehabilitation.
Copyright 2020 The Authors.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure: P. Melillo, Sanofi R&D (R), Shire (R); A. Prinster, None; V. Di Iorio, Shire (R); G. Olivo, None; F.M. D'Alterio, None; S. Cocozza, Sanofi (R), Amicus (R); M. Quarantelli, None; F. Testa, Sanofi R&D (R), Shire (R); A. Brunetti, None; F. Simonelli, Sanofi R&D (R), Shire (R), Spark Therapeutics (R)
Figures
References
-
- Strauss RW, Ho A, Munoz B, et al. .. The Natural History of the Progression of Atrophy Secondary to Stargardt Disease (ProgStar) studies: design and baseline characteristics: ProgStar report no. 1. Ophthalmology. 2016; 123: 817–828. - PubMed
-
- Allikmets R, Singh N, Sun H, et al. .. A photoreceptor cell-specific ATP-binding transporter gene (ABCR) is mutated in recessive Stargardt macular dystrophy. Nat Genet. 1997; 15: 236–246. - PubMed
-
- Von Noorden GK, Mackensen G. Phenomenology of eccentric fixation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1962; 53: 642–660. - PubMed
-
- Whittaker SG, Budd J, Cummings RW. Eccentric fixation with macular scotoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1988; 29: 268–278. - PubMed
-
- Fishman GA, Farber M, Patel BS, Derlacki DJ. Visual acuity loss in patients with Stargardt's macular dystrophy. Ophthalmology. 1987; 94: 809–814. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
