Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2020 Aug 13;17(16):5879.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165879.

Value-Based Healthcare in Ostomies

Affiliations
Observational Study

Value-Based Healthcare in Ostomies

Ana C Montesinos Gálvez et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

In order to achieve significant improvements in quality, cost, and accessibility (the health "iron triangle"), innovation in organizational and service delivery models is necessary to increase the value of healthcare. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficiency of a model of organizational innovation based on advanced practice nurse in the care of people with ostomies (APN-O) versus usual care. An observational, exploratory, analytical, prospective study with a six-month follow-up was carried out at 12 hospitals that implemented this model in Andalusia. A total of 75 patients who had undergone a digestive elimination ostomy and/or a urinary ostomy were followed for six months. Clinical outcomes, healthcare resources, health-related quality of life, and willingness to pay (WTP) were analyzed. The economic evaluation was conducted from a societal perspective, including healthcare costs and indirect costs. The cost difference between the two models was €136.99 and the quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained was 0.05965 (€2297 per QALY gained). At six months, the mean of WTP was €69 per APN-O consultation. This model contributes to increasing the value-based healthcare in ostomies. Results of this study suggested that APN-O is an effective patient management model for improving their health status and is highly efficient.

Keywords: cost-benefit analysis; health care costs; health resources; nurse specialists; organizational innovation; ostomy; prospective studies; quality-adjusted life years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of patients that express not having any health problems (EQ5D5L).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean score obtained with the Stoma Quality of Life Index specific survey. Range 0 = worse quality of life; 100 = better quality of life.

References

    1. Armendáriz-Rubio P., de Miguel Velasco M., Hurtado H.O. Comparison of colostomies and ileostomies as diverting stomas after low anterior resection. Cir. Esp. 2007;81:115–120. doi: 10.1016/S0009-739X(07)71280-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krouse R., Grant M., Ferrell B., Dean G., Nelson R., Chu D. Quality of life outcomes in 599 cancer and non-cancer patients with colostomies. J. Surg. Res. 2007;138:79–87. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2006.04.033. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cantero M.L., Collado E.J. Factores determinantes en la adaptación del paciente portador de ostomía y la importancia del estomaterapeuta. Agora Salut. 2016;3:57–66. doi: 10.6035/AgoraSalut.2016.3.6. - DOI
    1. Cobos Serrano JL. On behalf COF group. El Libro Blanco de la Ostomía en España. Coloplast Productos Médicos S.A.; Madrid, Spain: 2017.
    1. Spanish Cancer Registries REDECAN. [(accessed on 3 March 2020)]; Available online: https://redecan.org/redecan.org/en/index.html.

Publication types