Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 14;17(16):5915.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165915.

Proposal of New Health Risk Assessment Method for Deficient Essential Elements in Drinking Water-Case Study of the Slovak Republic

Affiliations

Proposal of New Health Risk Assessment Method for Deficient Essential Elements in Drinking Water-Case Study of the Slovak Republic

Stanislav Rapant et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

The US EPA health risk assessment method is currently widely used to assess human health risks for many environmental constituents. It is used for risk assessment from the exposure to various contaminants exceeding tolerable or safe reference doses, determined e.g., for drinking water, soil, air and food. It accepts widely that excess contents of non-essential elements (e.g., As, Pb or Sb) in environmental compartments represent a general risk to human health. However, contrary to toxic trace elements, deficient contents of essential (biogenic) elements e.g., F, I, Se, Zn, Fe, Ca or Mg may represent even higher health risk. Therefore, we propose to extend the human health risk assessment by calculating the health risk for deficient content and intake of essential elements, and to introduce the terms Average Daily Missing Dose (ADMD), Average Daily Required Dose (ADRD) and Average Daily Accepted Dose (ADAD). We propose the following equation to calculate the Hazard Quotient (HQ) of health risk from deficient elements: HQd = ADRD/ADAD. At present, there are no reference concentrations or doses of essential elements in each environmental compartment in world databases (Integrated Risk Information System IRIS, The Risk Assessment Information System RAIS). ADRD and ADMD can be derived from different regulatory standards or guidelines (if they exist) or calculated from actual regional data on the state of population health and content of essential elements in the environment, e.g., in groundwater or soil. This methodology was elaborated and tested on inhabitants of the Slovak Republic supplied with soft drinking water with an average Mg content of 5.66 mg·L-1. The calculated ADMD of Mg for these inhabitants is 0.314 mg·kg-1·day-1 and HQd is equal to 2.94, indicating medium risk of chronic diseases. This method extending traditional health risk assessment is the first attempt to quantify deficient content of essential elements in drinking water. It still has some limitations but also has potential to be further developed and refined through its testing in other countries.

Keywords: average daily missing dose; calcium; deficiency; drinking water; essential elements; human health risk assessment; magnesium.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic map showing location of the Slovak Republic in Europe and municipalities divided into the two groups: group of municipalities with “soft” water and group of municipalities with “hard” water.

References

    1. US EPA . Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (HHEM), Part A-Baseline Risk Assessment, Interim Final. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response; Washington, DC, USA: 1989. (EPA/540/1-89/002)
    1. US EPA . Exposure Factors Handbook I., II, III. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Center for Environmental Assessment; Washington, DC, USA: 1997. (EPA/600/P-95/002Fa)
    1. US EPA . Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (RAGS), Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (HHEM), Part E-Supplemental Guidance for Dermal Risk Assessment, Final. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation; Washington, DC, USA: 2004.
    1. US EPA . Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum; Washington, DC, USA: 2005. (EPA/630/P-03/001F)
    1. US EPA . Child-Specific Exposure Factors Handbook. United States Environmental Protection Agency, National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development; Washington, DC, USA: 2008. (EPA/600/R-06/096F)

Publication types