Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug 16;20(16):4604.
doi: 10.3390/s20164604.

Wireless Technologies for Implantable Devices

Affiliations
Review

Wireless Technologies for Implantable Devices

Bradley D Nelson et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Wireless technologies are incorporated in implantable devices since at least the 1950s. With remote data collection and control of implantable devices, these wireless technologies help researchers and clinicians to better understand diseases and to improve medical treatments. Today, wireless technologies are still more commonly used for research, with limited applications in a number of clinical implantable devices. Recent development and standardization of wireless technologies present a good opportunity for their wider use in other types of implantable devices, which will significantly improve the outcomes of many diseases or injuries. This review briefly describes some common wireless technologies and modern advancements, as well as their strengths and suitability for use in implantable medical devices. The applications of these wireless technologies in treatments of orthopedic and cardiovascular injuries and disorders are described. This review then concludes with a discussion on the technical challenges and potential solutions of implementing wireless technologies in implantable devices.

Keywords: implantable medical devices; implantable sensors; wireless communication; wireless power; wireless sensors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Communication and power schemes typically used in active and passive sensors.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The design of a generic passive interrogator. A signal is generated in the excitation circuit and transmitted at radiofrequency (RF) using an inductive coil or at ultrasound frequencies using a piezoelectric element. The reflected signal is received by a receiving circuit using a matching coil or piezoelectric element.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Methods of remote power for implantable devices. RF energy (top-left) can be transmitted through inductors; ultrasound energy (middle-left) can be transmitted through piezoelectric materials; near-infrared (NIR) light (bottom-left) can be transmitted via light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and photoreceptors. The received energy may be either stored in a battery or used directly.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A smart hip implant featuring a telemetered temperature sensor to detect loosening. CC BY [85].
Figure 5
Figure 5
An example of a remote-powered blood pressure sensor. Power is received via the stent, which doubles as an antenna, to power the sensor and processing integrated circuit (IC). Reprinted with permission from Reference [110].

References

    1. Takahata K., De Hennis A., Wise K.D., Gianchandani Y.B. A Wireless Microsensor For Monitoring Flow and Pressure in a Blood Vessel Utilizing a Dual-Inductor Antenna Stent and Two Pressure Sensors; Proceedings of the 17th IEEE International Conference on Micro Electo Mechanical Systems; Maastricht, The Netherlands. 25–29 January 2004; pp. 216–219.
    1. Sanders R.S., Lee M.T. Implantable pacemakers. Proc. IEEE. 1996;84:480–486. doi: 10.1109/5.486749. - DOI
    1. Bergmann G., Graichen F., Siraky J., Jendrzynski H., Rohlmann A. Multichannel strain gauge telemetry for orthopaedic implants. J. Biomech. 1988;21:169–176. doi: 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90009-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nicholls P.J., Berg E., Bliven J.F., Kling J.M. X-ray diagnosis of healing fractures in rabbits. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1979:234–236. doi: 10.1097/00003086-197907000-00037. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Anderson C., Saloner D., Lee R., Griswold V., Shapeero L., Rapp J., Nagarkar S., Pan X., Gooding G. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by MR angiography: Comparison with x-ray angiography. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1992;13:989–1003. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources