Antimicrobial Prosthetic Surfaces in the Oral Cavity-A Perspective on Creative Approaches
- PMID: 32824437
- PMCID: PMC7463865
- DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms8081247
Antimicrobial Prosthetic Surfaces in the Oral Cavity-A Perspective on Creative Approaches
Abstract
Replacement of missing teeth is an essential component of comprehensive dental care for patients suffering of edentulism. A popular option is implant-supported restorations. However, implant surfaces can become colonized with polymicrobial biofilms containing Candida species that may compromise peri-implant health. To prevent this, implant components may be treated with a variety of coatings to create surfaces that either repel the attachment of viable microorganisms or kill microorganisms on contact. These coatings may consist of nanoparticles of pure elements (more commonly silver, copper, and zinc), sanitizing agents and disinfectants (quaternary ammonium ions and chlorhexidine), antibiotics (cefalotin, vancomycin, and gentamicin), or antimicrobial peptides (AMPs). AMPs in bioactive coatings have a number of advantages. They elicit a protective action against pathogens, inhibit the formation of biofilms, are less toxic to host tissues, and do not prompt inflammatory responses. Furthermore, many of these coatings may involve unique delivery systems to direct their antimicrobial capacity against pathogens, but not commensals. Coatings may also contain multiple antimicrobial substances to widen antimicrobial activity across multiple microbial species. Here, we compiled relevant information about a variety of creative approaches used to generate antimicrobial prosthetic surfaces in the oral cavity with the purpose of facilitating implant integration and peri-implant tissue health.
Keywords: Candida; antibiotics; antimicrobial; antimicrobial peptides; disinfectants; implants; oral cavity; polymicrobial biofilms.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
References
-
- Hjalmarsson L., Gheisarifar M., Jemt T. A systematic review of survival of single implants as presented in longitudinal studies with a follow-up of at least 10 years. Eur. J. Oral Implantol. 2016;9(Suppl. 1):S155–S162. - PubMed
-
- Berglundh T., Armitage G., Araujo M.G., Avila-Ortiz G., Blanco J., Camargo P.M., Chen S., Cochran D., Derks J., Figuero E., et al. Peri-implant diseases and conditions: Consensus report of workgroup 4 of the 2017 World Workshop on the Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions. J. Periodontol. 2018;89(Suppl. 1):S313–S318. doi: 10.1002/JPER.17-0739. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources