Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;48(9):e813-e834.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004437.

Position Paper on Critical Care Pharmacy Services: 2020 Update

Affiliations

Position Paper on Critical Care Pharmacy Services: 2020 Update

Ishaq Lat et al. Crit Care Med. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Objectives: To provide a multiorganizational statement to update recommendations for critical care pharmacy practice and make recommendations for future practice. A position paper outlining critical care pharmacist activities was last published in 2000. Since that time, significant changes in healthcare and critical care have occurred.

Design: The Society of Critical Care Medicine, American College of Clinical Pharmacy Critical Care Practice and Research Network, and the American Society of Health-Systems Pharmacists convened a joint task force of 15 pharmacists representing a broad cross-section of critical care pharmacy practice and pharmacy administration, inclusive of geography, critical care practice setting, and roles. The Task Force chairs reviewed and organized primary literature, outlined topic domains, and prepared the methodology for group review and consensus. A modified Delphi method was used until consensus (> 66% agreement) was reached for each practice recommendation. Previous position statement recommendations were reviewed and voted to either retain, revise, or retire. Recommendations were categorized by level of ICU service to be applicable by setting and grouped into five domains: patient care, quality improvement, research and scholarship, training and education, and professional development.

Main results: There are 82 recommendation statements: 44 original recommendations and 38 new recommendation statements. Thirty-four recommendations represent the domain of patient care, primarily relating to critical care pharmacist duties and pharmacy services. In the quality improvement domain, 21 recommendations address the role of the critical care pharmacist in patient and medication safety, clinical quality programs, and analytics. Nine recommendations were made in the domain of research and scholarship. Ten recommendations were made in the domain of training and education and eight recommendations regarding professional development.

Conclusions: Critical care pharmacists are essential members of the multiprofessional critical care team. The statements recommended by this taskforce delineate the activities of a critical care pharmacist and the scope of pharmacy services within the ICU. Effort should be made from all stakeholders to implement the recommendations provided, with continuous effort toward improving the delivery of care for critically ill patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Vincent JL. Critical care—where have we been and where are we going?. Crit Care. 2013; 17Suppl 1S2
    1. Harvey AK, Whitney J, Nahata MC, et al. Francke’s legacy—40 years of clinical pharmacy. Ann Pharmacother. 2008; 42:121–126
    1. Rudis MI, Brandl KM. Position paper on critical care pharmacy services. Society of Critical Care Medicine and American College of Clinical Pharmacy Task Force on critical care pharmacy services. Crit Care Med. 2000; 28:3746–3750
    1. Maclaren R, Devlin JW, Martin SJ, et al. Critical care pharmacy services in United States hospitals. Ann Pharmacother. 2006; 40:612–618
    1. Haupt MT, Bekes CE, Brilli RJ, et al.; Task Force of the American College of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care MedicineGuidelines on critical care services and personnel: Recommendations based on a system of categorization of three levels of care. Crit Care Med. 2003; 31:2677–2683

MeSH terms