In Reply

Affiliations

¹ American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC.
² UTMB Health, Galveston, Texas.
³ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

Comment

Christopher M Zahn et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep.

. 2020 Sep;136(3):634-635.

doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004077.

¹ American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, DC.
² UTMB Health, Galveston, Texas.
³ Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.

No abstract available

Comment on

External Cephalic Version: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 221.
[No authors listed] [No authors listed] Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;135(5):e203-e212. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000003837. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32332415
External Cephalic Version: ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 221.
Baxi L. Baxi L. Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;136(3):634. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004076. Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32826583 No abstract available.

1. External cephalic version. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 221. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2020;135:e203–12.
1. Ranney B. The gentle art of external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1973;116:239–51.
1. Isakov O, Reicher L, Lavie A, Yogev Y, Maslovitz S. Prediction of success in external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Obstet Gynecol 2019;133:857–66.
1. Levin G, Rottenstreich A, Weill Y, Pollack RN. The role of bladder volume in the success of external cephalic version. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2018;230:178–81.