Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2020 Oct;29(10):878-884.
doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001634.

Pooled Efficacy and Safety Profile of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Pooled Efficacy and Safety Profile of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension

Inder P Singh et al. J Glaucoma. 2020 Oct.

Abstract

Precis: In pooled phase III analyses, once-daily netarsudil 0.02% resulted in intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction that was noninferior to twice-daily timolol 0.5%, with minimal treatment-related serious or systemic adverse events (AEs). Ocular AEs were generally tolerable.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the Rho kinase inhibitor netarsudil in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Patients and methods: Pooled analysis of data from the ROCKET-1 to 4 phase III studies of once-daily (PM) netarsudil or twice-daily timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The primary efficacy measure was mean IOP at 8:00 AM, 10:00 AM, and 4:00 PM at week 2, week 6, and month 3 in patients with baseline IOP <25 mm Hg.

Results: In the pooled primary efficacy population (netarsudil, n=494; timolol, n=510), once-daily netarsudil was noninferior to twice-daily timolol at all 9 timepoints through month 3. Mean treated IOP ranged from 16.4 to 18.1 mm Hg among netarsudil-treated patients and 16.8 to 17.6 mm Hg among timolol-treated patients. In the pooled safety population (n=839 in each treatment group), treatment-related serious AEs occurred at similar frequencies in each treatment group (netarsudil, 0.1%; timolol, 0%). The most common ocular AE, conjunctival hyperemia (netarsudil, 54.4%; timolol, 10.4%), was graded as mild in 77.6% (354/456) of affected netarsudil-treated patients.

Conclusions: Once-daily netarsudil resulted in IOP lowering that was noninferior to twice-daily timolol, with tolerable ocular AEs that were generally mild and self-resolving. As a first-in-class agent in the United States, with a novel mechanism of action, netarsudil may provide a useful therapeutic option for patients who would benefit from IOP lowering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: I.P.S. is a paid consultant to Aerie Pharmaceuticals and has received research funding from Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Ivantis, Glaukos, Bausch + Lomb/Valeant, Allergan, Ellex, Alcon, and Katena/IOP. He has also served as consultant to Glaukos, Bausch + Lomb/Valeant, Allergan, and Ellex and on speakers’ bureaus for Glaukos, Bausch + Lomb/Valeant, Allergan, Ellex, Alcon, Katena/IOP, Shire, and Novabay. R.D.F. is a paid consultant of Aerie Pharmaceuticals and has served as a consultant to Akorn, Nicox, and Novartis. His research is supported, in part, by an unrestricted grant from Research to Prevent Blindness. J.S.M. has received honoraria from Allergan and Novartis and serves as a consultant to Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Allergan, Glaukos, MicrOptx, and Olleyes. His institution has received research grants from Aerie Pharmaceuticals, Allergan, Bausch + Lomb/Valeant, Diopsys, Heidelberg, Inotek, Merck, Novartis, Olleyes, and Zeiss. T.K. serves as a consultant to, and his institution has received research funding from, Aerie Pharmaceuticals. H.M., R.A.L., and C.C.K. are salaried employees of and own stock in Aerie Pharmaceuticals. D.W.U. is a paid statistical consultant to Aerie Pharmaceuticals. H.S. and T.H. are previous employees of Aerie Pharmaceuticals.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Pooled analysis population. *Numbers of patients shown are the safety population. †A netarsudil bid study arm was included in ROCKET-2 and ROCKET-3 but was not evaluated in this analysis. AE indicates adverse event; bid, twice daily; IOP, intraocular pressure; OAG, open-angle glaucoma; OHT, ocular hypertension; QD, once daily.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Mean IOP through month 3 in the per-protocol population of patients with baseline IOP <25 mm Hg (primary efficacy population). Error bars are ±SD. CI indicates confidence interval; IOP, intraocular pressure; SD, standard deviation.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
A, Change from baseline in mean diurnal intraocular pressure (IOP) at month 3 for subgroups with different baseline IOP thresholds (per-protocol population). B, Percentage of patients at month 3 achieving ≥20% reduction in mean diurnal IOP for subgroups with different baseline IOP thresholds (per-protocol populations). *P<0.05 (once-daily netarsudil 0.02% vs. twice-daily timolol 0.5%). Error bars are SEM. SEM indicates standard error of the mean.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Mean change from baseline in heart rate. *P<0.01 versus baseline. Error bars are ±SD. SD indicates standard deviation.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
A, Mean conjunctival hyperemia score (8:00 am) via biomicroscopy. B, Investigator-assessed maximum severity of conjunctival hyperemia (8:00 am) among patients administered once-daily netarsudil. Biomicroscopic grading of conjunctival hyperemia was performed on a standardized, 4-point scale [0=none (normal; appears white with a small number of conjunctival blood vessels easily observed); 1=mild (prominent pinkish-red color of both the bulbar and palpebral conjunctiva); 2=moderate (bright, scarlet red color of the bulbar and palpebral conjunctiva); 3=severe (“beefy red” with petechiae; dark red bulbar and palpebral conjunctiva with evidence of subconjunctival hemorrhage)].

References

    1. Vrabec JP, Levin LA. The neurobiology of cell death in glaucoma. Eye. 2007;21(suppl 1):S11–S14. - PubMed
    1. Tham YC, Li X, Wong TY, et al. Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014;121:2081–2090. - PubMed
    1. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126:498–505. - PubMed
    1. The AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000;130:429–440. - PubMed
    1. Kass MA, Gordon MO, Gao F, et al. Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study Group. Delaying treatment of ocular hypertension: the ocular hypertension treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128:276–287. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms