Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Jan 12;58(1):10-25.
doi: 10.1093/jme/tjaa157.

A Review of the Control of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Continental United States

Affiliations
Review

A Review of the Control of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) in the Continental United States

Bethany L McGregor et al. J Med Entomol. .

Abstract

Aedes aegypti (L) is an anthropophilic mosquito involved in the transmission of a variety of viral pathogens worldwide including dengue, chikungunya, yellow fever, and Zika viruses. This species, native to Africa, is well established in the continental U.S. (CONUS) and occasionally contributes to localized outbreaks of viral diseases. In the last seven decades, mosquito control programs in the CONUS have been focused on vectors of eastern equine encephalitis, St. Louis encephalitis, and West Nile viruses, as well as nuisance species. Aedes aegypti receives little control focus except during outbreak periods, which has led to a lack of information on appropriate and effective control options targeting Ae. aegypti in the CONUS. As such, in the event of an Ae. aegypti-borne arboviral outbreak in the CONUS, there are limited evidence-based control recommendations or protocols in place. Autochthonous outbreaks of Ae. aegypti-borne pathogens have occurred recently in the CONUS, including dengue outbreaks in 2010 and 2013, a chikungunya outbreak in 2014, and the 2016 outbreak of Zika virus. The increasing frequency of Ae. aegypti-borne outbreaks necessitates increased attention and research on control of this species to prevent and mitigate future outbreaks. This review consolidates and synthesizes the available literature on control of Ae. aegypti, specifically within the CONUS, focusing on data generated through operational applications as well as field and semifield experiments. The purpose of this review is to identify and highlight areas where additional research is needed. The review covers chemical control and insecticide resistance, biological control, source reduction, trapping, and alternative techniques.

Keywords: Aedes aegypti; continental U.S; mosquito control.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Abedi ZH, and Brown AWA. 1961. Peritrophic membrane as vehicle for DDT and DDE excretion in Aedes aegypti larvae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am 54: 539–542.
    1. Achee NL, Grieco JP, Vatandoost H, Seixas G, Pinto J, Ching-Ng L, Martins AJ, Juntarajumnong W, Corbel V, Gouagna C, et al. 2019. Alternative strategies for mosquito-borne arbovirus control. PLoS Neglect. Trop. D 13: e0007275. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aldridge RL, Golden FV, Britch SC, Blersch J, and Linthicum KJ. 2018. Truck-mounted Natural 2EC (Spinosad) ULV residual treatment in a simulated urban environment to control Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in North Florida. J. Am. Mosquito Contr. Assoc 34: 53–57. - PubMed
    1. Anastasia Mosquito Control District. 2017. 2017 Annual Program Report. http://www.amcdsjc.org/media/270205/2017_annual_report%20final.pdf
    1. Andreadis TG 2007. Microsporidian parasites of mosquitoes. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc 23: 3–29. - PubMed

MeSH terms