Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep;184(3):578-589.
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31837. Epub 2020 Aug 23.

Molecular diagnostic challenges for non-retinal developmental eye disorders in the United Kingdom

Affiliations

Molecular diagnostic challenges for non-retinal developmental eye disorders in the United Kingdom

Daniel Jackson et al. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2020 Sep.

Abstract

Overall, approximately one-quarter of patients with genetic eye diseases will receive a molecular diagnosis. Patients with developmental eye disorders face a number of diagnostic challenges including phenotypic heterogeneity with significant asymmetry, coexisting ocular and systemic disease, limited understanding of human eye development and the associated genetic repertoire, and lack of access to next generation sequencing as regarded not to impact on patient outcomes/management with cost implications. Herein, we report our real world experience from a pediatric ocular genetics service over a 12 month period with 72 consecutive patients from 62 families, and that from a cohort of 322 patients undergoing whole genome sequencing (WGS) through the Genomics England 100,000 Genomes Project; encompassing microphthalmia, anophthalmia, ocular coloboma (MAC), anterior segment dysgenesis anomalies (ASDA), primary congenital glaucoma, congenital cataract, infantile nystagmus, and albinism. Overall molecular diagnostic rates reached 24.9% for those recruited to the 100,000 Genomes Project (73/293 families were solved), but up to 33.9% in the clinic setting (20/59 families). WGS was able to improve genetic diagnosis for MAC patients (15.7%), but not for ASDA (15.0%) and congenital cataracts (44.7%). Increased sample sizes and accurate human phenotype ontology (HPO) terms are required to improve diagnostic accuracy. The significant mixed complex ocular phenotypes distort these rates and lead to missed variants if the correct gene panel is not applied. Increased molecular diagnoses will help to explain the genotype-phenotype relationships of these developmental eye disorders. In turn, this will lead to improved integrated care pathways, understanding of disease, and future therapeutic development.

Keywords: developmental eye disorders; genetic eye disease; next generation sequencing; targeted gene panels; whole genome sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Overview of disease subgroups presenting to a pediatric ocular genetics service and those recruited into the UK 100,000 Genomes Project with corresponding diagnostic rates. (a) Proportion of disease subgroups of developmental eye disorder families seen through the pediatric ocular genetics service between 1st October 2017 and 30th September 2018 at MEH (Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust). (b) Proportion of disease subgroups of families with developmental eye disorders recruited into the 100,000 Genomes Project between 2015 and 2018. (c) Molecular diagnostic rates from whole genome sequencing (WGS) by disease subgroup for families recruited into the 100,000 Genomes Project. ASDA, anterior segment dysgenesis anomalies; MAC, microphthalmia, anophthalmia and coloboma; NPF, no primary findings

References

    1. Audo, I., Bujakowska, K. M., Leveillard, T., Mohand‐Said, S., Lancelot, M. E., Germain, A., … Zeitz, C. (2012). Development and application of a next‐generation‐sequencing (NGS) approach to detect known and novel gene defects underlying retinal diseases. Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, 7, 8. 10.1186/1750-1172-7-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bernardis, I., Chiesi, L., Tenedini, E., Artuso, L., Percesepe, A., Artusi, V., … Tagliafico, E. (2016). Unravelling the complexity of inherited retinal dystrophies molecular testing: Added value of targeted next‐generation sequencing. BioMed Research International, 2016, 6341870–6341814. 10.1155/2016/6341870 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Busby, A., Dolk, H., & Armstrong, B. (2005). Eye anomalies: Seasonal variation and maternal viral infections. Epidemiology, 16(3), 317–322. 10.1097/01.ede.0000158817.43037.ab - DOI - PubMed
    1. Capasso, J. (2014). The cost of genetic testing for ocular disease: Who pays? Current Opinion in Ophthalmology, 25, 394–399. - PubMed
    1. Capowski, E. E., Wright, L. S., Liang, K., Phillips, M. J., Wallace, K., Petelinsek, A., … Gamm, D. M. (2016). Regulation of WNT signaling by VSX2 during optic vesicle patterning in human induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells, 34(11), 2625–2634. 10.1002/stem.2414 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Supplementary concepts