Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug;50(1):215-275.
doi: 10.1177/0081175020922879. Epub 2020 Jun 2.

Estimating Contextual Effects from Ego Network Data

Affiliations

Estimating Contextual Effects from Ego Network Data

Jeffrey A Smith et al. Sociol Methodol. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Network concepts are often used to characterize the features of a social context. For example, past work has asked if individuals in more socially cohesive neighborhoods have better mental health outcomes. Despite the ubiquity of use, it is relatively rare for contextual studies to employ the methods of network analysis. This is the case, in part, because network data are difficult to collect, requiring information on all ties between all actors. This paper asks whether it is possible to avoid such heavy data collection while still retaining the best features of a contextual-network study. The basic idea is to apply network sampling to the problem of contextual models, where one uses sampled ego network data to infer the network features of each context, and then uses the inferred network features as second-level predictors in a hierarchical linear model. We test the validity of this idea in the case of network cohesion. Using two complete datasets as a test, we find that ego network data are sufficient to capture the relationship between cohesion and important outcomes, like attachment and deviance. The hope, going forward, is that researchers will find it easier to incorporate holistic network measures into traditional regression models.

Keywords: Adolescents; Cohesion; Ego Networks; Exponential Random Graph Models; Hierarchical Linear Models; Network Sampling.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Ego Network Data from Three Hypothetical Respondents
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Measuring Cohesion Using Bicomponent Size
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Estimate of Density and Bicomponent Size by True Values for Add Health Networks
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Boxplots of Density Coefficients for Attachment to School Models
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Boxplots of Bicomponent Cofficients for Attachment to School Models
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Boxplots of Density Coefficients for Behavioral Problems Models
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Boxplots of Bicomponent Coefficients for Behavioral Problems Models

References

    1. Almquist Zack W. 2012. “Random Errors in Egocentric Networks.” Social networks 34(4):493–505. 10.1016/j.socnet.2012.03.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alwin Duane F. 2007. Margins of Error: A Study of Reliability in Survey Measurement, Vol. 547: John Wiley & Sons.
    1. Anderson Brigham S., Butts Carter and Carley Kathleen. 1999. “The Interaction of Size and Density with Graph-Level Indices.” Social Networks 21(3):239–67. 10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00011-8. - DOI
    1. Bearman Peter S. 1991. “The Social Structure of Suicide.” Sociological Forum 6(3):501–24. 10.1007/bf01114474. - DOI
    1. Berkman Lisa F., Glass Thomas, Brissette Ian and Seeman Teresa E. 2000. “From Social Integration to Health: Durkheim in the New Millennium☆.” Social Science & Medicine 51(6):843–57. 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources