Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;9(4):440-451.
doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2020.04.02.

Neuroendocrine liver metastases: a contemporary review of treatment strategies

Affiliations
Review

Neuroendocrine liver metastases: a contemporary review of treatment strategies

Jordan M Cloyd et al. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are globally increasing in prevalence and the liver is the most common site of metastasis. Neuroendocrine liver metastases (NELM) are heterogeneous in clinical presentation and prognosis. Fortunately, recent advances in diagnostic techniques and therapeutic strategies have improved the multidisciplinary management of this challenging condition. When feasible, surgical resection of NELM offers the best long-term outcomes. General indications for hepatic resection include performance status acceptable for major liver surgery, grade 1 or 2 tumors, absence of extrahepatic disease, adequate size and function of future liver remnant, and feasibility of resecting >90% of metastases. Adjunct therapies including concomitant liver ablation are generally safe when used appropriately and may expand the number of patients eligible for surgery. Among patients with synchronous resectable NELM, resection of the primary either in a staged or combined fashion is recommended. For patients who are not surgical candidates, liver-directed therapies such as transarterial embolization, chemoembolization, and radioembolization can provide locoregional control and improve symptoms of carcinoid syndrome. Multiple systemic therapy options also exist for patients with advanced or progressive disease. Ongoing research efforts are needed to identify novel biomarkers that will define the optimal indications for and sequencing of treatments to be delivered in a personalized fashion.

Keywords: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs); carcinoid; hepatic resection; liver-directed therapies; targeted therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2020.04.02). TMP serves as an unpaid editorial board member of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Representative example of NELM on (A) arterial phase CT, (B) portal venous phase CT, and (C) 68Ga-DOTATATE CT-PET. NELM, neuroendocrine liver metastases; CT, computed tomography; PET, positron emission tomography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative example of 68Ga-DOTATATE CT-PET demonstrating somatostatin receptor avid metastatic disease in the breast, peritoneum, bone, and lymph nodes in a patient with unremarkable CT imaging. CT, computed tomography; PET, positron emission tomography.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Proposed clinical pathway for managing patients with NELM based on the authors’ institutional experience. NELM, neuroendocrine liver metastases; PNET, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor; TAE, transarterial embolization; XRT, radiation therapy; PRRT; peptide receptor radionuclide therapy; SSAs, somatostatin analogs.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pavel M, Baudin E, Couvelard A, et al. ENETS consensus guidelines for the management of patients with liver and other distant metastases from neuroendocrine neoplasms of foregut, midgut, hindgut, and unknown primary. Neuroendocrinology 2012;95:157-76. 10.1159/000335597 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yao JC, Hassan M, Phan A, et al. One hundred years after “carcinoid”: epidemiology of and prognostic factors for neuroendocrine tumors in 35,825 cases in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:3063-72. 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.4377 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Frilling A, Modlin IM, Kidd M, et al. Recommendations for management of patients with neuroendocrine liver metastases. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:e8-21. 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70362-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dasari A, Shen C, Halperin D, et al. Trends in the incidence, prevalence, and survival outcomes in patients with neuroendocrine tumors in the United States. JAMA Oncol 2017;3:1335-42. 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0589 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rinke A, Müller HH, Schade-Brittinger C, et al. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, prospective, randomized study on the effect of octreotide lar in the control of tumor growth in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine midgut tumors: a report from the PROMID study group. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:4656-63. 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.8510 - DOI - PubMed