Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;9(4):464-483.
doi: 10.21037/hbsn-20-446.

International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Affiliations
Review

International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy

Renyi Qin et al. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Importance: While laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) is being adopted with increasing enthusiasm worldwide, it is still challenging for both technical and anatomical reasons. Currently, there is no consensus on the technical standards for LPD.

Objective: The aim of this consensus statement is to guide the continued safe progression and adoption of LPD.

Evidence review: An international panel of experts was selected based on their clinical and scientific expertise in laparoscopic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy. Statements were produced upon reviewing the literature and assessed by the members of the expert panel. The literature search and its critical appraisal were limited to articles published in English during the period from 1994 to 2019. The Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane Library and Clinical Trials databases were searched, The search strategy included, but was not limited to, the terms 'laparoscopic', 'pancreaticoduodenectomy, 'pancreatoduodenectomy', 'Whipple's operation', and 'minimally invasive surgery'. Reference lists from the included articles were manually checked for any additional studies, which were included when appropriate. Delphi method was used to establish expert consensus and the AGREE II-GRS Instrument was applied to assess the methodological quality and externally validate the final statements. The statements were further discussed during a one-day face-to-face meeting at the 1st Summit on Minimally Invasive Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery in Wuhan, China.

Findings: Twenty-eight international experts from 8 countries constructed the expert panel. Sixteen statements were produced by the members of the expert panel. At least 80% of responders agreed with the majority (80%) of statements. Other than three randomized controlled trials published to date, most evidences were based on level 3 or 4 studies according to the AGREE II-GRS Instrument.

Conclusions and relevance: The Wuhan international expert consensus meeting on LPD has produced a set of clinical practice statements for the safe development and progression of LPD. LPD is currently in its development and exploration stages, as defined by the international IDEAL framework for surgical innovation. More robust randomized controlled trial and registry study are essential to proceed with the assessment of LPD.

Keywords: Consensus; Delphi technique; laparoscopy; pancreaticoduodenectomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/hbsn-20-446). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA diagram. Graphical representation of the publications that were reviewed in the process of generating this consensus statement. Three independent literature searches were performed, with each search including ‘(pancreatoduodenectomy OR pancreaticoduodenectomy) AND laparoscopic’. Level of evidence was graded according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine from 1 to 5.

Comment in

References

    1. Gagner M, Pomp A. Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 1994;8:408-10. 10.1007/BF00642443 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dokmak S, Aussilhou B, Calmels M, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy with reconstruction of the mesentericoportal vein with the parietal peritoneum and the falciform ligament. Surg Endosc 2018;32:3256-61. 10.1007/s00464-018-6044-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caruso F, Alessandri G, Cesana G, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors of the head of pancreas; 10 cases for a single center experience. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2017;21:3745-53. - PubMed
    1. Gumbs AA, Gres P, Madureira FA, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open resection of noninvasive intraductal pancreatic mucinous neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg 2008;12:707-12. 10.1007/s11605-007-0311-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bausch D, Keck T. Laparoscopic pancreatic resections. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013;398:939-45. 10.1007/s00423-013-1108-z - DOI - PubMed