Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 17;6(29):eaba5908.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba5908. eCollection 2020 Jul.

The evolution of infant mortality inequality in the United States, 1960-2016

Affiliations

The evolution of infant mortality inequality in the United States, 1960-2016

Nick Turner et al. Sci Adv. .

Abstract

What is the relationship between infant mortality and poverty in the United States and how has it changed over time? We address this question by analyzing county-level data between 1960 and 2016. Our estimates suggest that level differences in mortality rates between the poorest and least poor counties decreased meaningfully between 1960 and 2000. Nearly three-quarters of the decrease occurred between 1960 and 1980, coincident with the introduction of antipoverty programs and improvements in medical care for infants. We estimate that declining inequality accounts for 18% of the national reduction in infant mortality between 1960 and 2000. However, we also find that level differences between the poorest and least poor counties remained constant between 2000 and 2016, suggesting an important role for policies that improve the health of infants in poor areas.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Mortality rates and fitted values.
(A) shows results for infant mortality rates, (B) shows results for neonatal mortality rates, and (C) shows results for postneonatal mortality rates (mortality rates defined in the notes to Table 1). The lines in each figure show fitted values estimated from population weighted county-level regressions each year using Eq. 1 and are shown for 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2016. Table 2 shows parameter estimates for each regression. Data points in the figures show mean mortality rates for each poverty ventile for 1960 and 2016 only to improve readability of the figures. Data on mortality rates are from the CDC, and data on poverty rates are from the U.S. Census Bureau.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Mortality-poverty gradient estimates.
(A) shows results for infant mortality, (B) shows results for neonatal mortality, and (C) shows results for postneonatal mortality. The lines in each figure show parameter estimates of the effect of increasing one unit in the poverty ventile distribution on the given mortality rate, estimated in each year using Eq. 1. The shaded areas show the 95% confidence intervals based on SEs clustered at the poverty ventile level. Table 2 reports parameter estimates and SEs. Data on mortality rates are from the CDC, and data on poverty rates are from the U.S. Census Bureau.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Mortality rates, fitted values, and gradients, by gender.
Both panels show results for infant mortality. Because of data limitations, the first available year of data for these figures is 1970. The lines in (A) and the gradients in (B) are based on estimates from weighted county-level regressions each year using Eq. 1. Table 2 reports parameter estimates for each regression. In (A), data points show mean mortality rates for each poverty ventile for 1970 and 2016 only to improve readability of the figures. In (B), we omit the confidence intervals to increase readability of the figure as the confidence intervals overlap in each year. Data on mortality rates are from the CDCs, and data on poverty rates are from the U.S. Census Bureau.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Counterfactual and actual mortality rates, by year.
(A) shows results for infant mortality rates, (B) shows results for neonatal mortality rates, and (C) shows results for postneonatal mortality rates (mortality rates defined in the notes to Table 1). The solid lines show actual mortality rates. The dashed lines show counterfactual mortality rates, defined as the mortality rate that would exist if (i) the mortality gradient remained at the 1960 value reported in Table 2 and (ii) each poverty ventile experienced a reduction in mortality rates over time equal to the actual reduction experienced by the least poor ventile. Table S1 reports the counterfactual estimates in each year. Data on mortality rates are from the CDC, and data on poverty rates are from the U.S. Census Bureau.

References

    1. Cutler D. M., Deaton A. S., Lleras-Muney A., The determinants of mortality. J. Econ. Perspect. 20, 97–120 (2006).
    1. Waldron H., Mortality differentials by lifetime earnings decile: Implications for evaluations of proposed Social Security law changes. Soc. Secur. Bull. 73, 1–37 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Braveman P. A., Cubbin C., Egerter S., Williams D. R., Pamuk E., Socioeconomic disparities in health in the United States: What the patterns tell us. Am. J. Public Health 100, 186–196 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Meara E. R., Richards S., Cutler D., The gap gets bigger: Changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education, 1981‑2000. Health Aff. 27, 350–360 (2008). - PMC - PubMed
    1. A. Deaton, The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality (Princeton Univ. Press, 2013), 123 pp.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources