Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;47(2):243-263.
doi: 10.1037/xlm0000956. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

Asymmetrical interference between item and order information in short-term memory

Affiliations

Asymmetrical interference between item and order information in short-term memory

Dominic Guitard et al. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

To recall a list of items just after the end of the presentation, participants must encode both the items and the order in which they were presented. Despite a long history of studying item and order information, little is known regarding the relation between them. Here, we examined this issue with a novel task in which participants saw two 4- or 6-item lists on each trial, along with specific instructions for each list to be encoded for subsequent item information retrieval or order reconstruction. In Experiments 1, 2, and 5, words were used for both item and order lists, whereas in Experiments 3 and 4, words were used for one list and characters for the other. An item recognition task was used in Experiments 1-4, and item reconstruction from a fragment was used in Experiment 5. The general finding was that order retention was hindered when both lists required order reconstruction compared to when one list required item information only. In certain circumstances, retention of items in the first list was impaired when the second list also required item retention. We address the pattern of results with a new theoretical account in which overwriting occurs for similar materials and in which there is a capacity limit specific to order information. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Proportion of correct response for Experiment 1 as a function of encoding condition (different, same), and tested list (list 1, list 2) for each memory test (order test, item test). Error bars show standard error of the mean.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proportion of correct response for Experiment 2 as a function of encoding condition (different, same), and tested list (list 1, list 2) for each memory test (order test, item test). Error bars show standard error of the mean.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Proportion of correct response for Experiment 3 as a function of encoding condition (different, same), and tested list (list 1, list 2) for each memory test (order test, item test). Error bars show standard error of the mean.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Proportion of correct response for Experiment 4 as a function of encoding condition (different, same), and tested list (list 1, list 2) for each memory test (order test, item test). Error bars show standard error of the mean.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Proportion of correct response for Experiment 5 as a function of encoding condition (different, same), and tested list (list 1, list 2) for each memory test (order test, item test). Error bars show standard error of the mean. The solid line in the order test panel represents mean performance of the order task in the single list condition, while the dashed line in the item test panel represents mean performance of the item task in the single list condition.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anderson JR, & Matessa M (1997). A production system theory of serial memory. Psychological Review, 104, 728–748. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.728 - DOI
    1. Barrouillet P, & Camos V (2015). Working memory: Loss and reconstruction. London, UK: Psychology Press.
    1. Beaudry O, Saint-Aubin J, Guérard K, & Pâquet M (2018). Are lexical factors immune to response modality in backward recall? The effects of imageability and word frequency. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(2), 105–116. doi:10.1037/cep0000126 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bireta TJ, Fry SE, Jalbert A, Neath I, Surprenant AM, Tehan G, & Tolan GA (2010). Backward recall and benchmark effects of working memory. Memory & Cognition, 38, 279–291. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.3.279 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjork EJ, & Healy AF (1974). Short-term order and item retention. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 80–97. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(74)80033-2 - DOI