Digital tools against COVID-19: taxonomy, ethical challenges, and navigation aid
- PMID: 32835200
- PMCID: PMC7324107
- DOI: 10.1016/S2589-7500(20)30137-0
Digital tools against COVID-19: taxonomy, ethical challenges, and navigation aid
Abstract
Data collection and processing via digital public health technologies are being promoted worldwide by governments and private companies as strategic remedies for mitigating the COVID-19 pandemic and loosening lockdown measures. However, the ethical and legal boundaries of deploying digital tools for disease surveillance and control purposes are unclear, and a rapidly evolving debate has emerged globally around the promises and risks of mobilising digital tools for public health. To help scientists and policy makers to navigate technological and ethical uncertainty, we present a typology of the primary digital public health applications that are in use. These include proximity and contact tracing, symptom monitoring, quarantine control, and flow modelling. For each, we discuss context-specific risks, cross-sectional issues, and ethical concerns. Finally, recognising the need for practical guidance, we propose a navigation aid for policy makers and other decision makers for the ethical development and use of digital public health tools.
© 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license.
Figures
References
-
- Google Apple and Google partner on COVID-19 contact tracing technology. April 10, 2020. https://blog.google/inside-google/company-announcements/apple-and-google...
-
- Amnesty International COVID-19, surveillance and the threat to your rights. April 3, 2020. https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/04/covid-19-surveillance-thr...
-
- Gostin L. Public health strategies for pandemic influenza: ethics and the law. JAMA. 2006;295:1700–1704. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
