The Effects of Governmental and Individual Predictors on COVID-19 Protective Behaviors in China: A Path Analysis Model
- PMID: 32836438
- PMCID: PMC7276878
- DOI: 10.1111/puar.13236
The Effects of Governmental and Individual Predictors on COVID-19 Protective Behaviors in China: A Path Analysis Model
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has plunged the world into a crisis. To contain this crisis, it is essential to build full cooperation between the government and the public. However, it is unclear which governmental and individual factors are determinants and how they interact with protective behaviors against COVID-19. To resolve this issue, this study builds a multiple mediation model. Findings show that government emergency public information such as detailed pandemic information and positive risk communication had greater impact on protective behaviors than rumor refutation and supplies. Moreover, governmental factors may indirectly affect protective behaviors through individual factors such as perceived efficacy, positive emotions, and risk perception. These findings suggest that systematic intervention programs for governmental factors need to be integrated with individual factors to achieve effective prevention and control of COVID-19 among the public.
© 2020 by The American Society for Public Administration.
Figures
References
-
- Abolghasemi, A. , and Taklavi Varaniyab S.. 2010. Resilience and Perceived Stress: Predictors of Life Satisfaction in the Students of Success and Failure. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 5: 748–52. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.178. - DOI
-
- Allen, Kerry . 2020. Coronavirus: Cement Mixers Become Celebrities in China Lockdown. BBC News, January 31. https://www.bbc.com/news/world‐asia‐china‐51315238 [accessed May 27, 2020].
-
- Barnett, Daniel J. , Thompson Carol B., Semon Natalie L., Errett Nicole A., Harrison Krista L., Anderson Marilyn K., Ferrell Justin L., et al. 2014. EPPM and Willingness to Respond: The Role of Risk and Efficacy Communication in Strengthening Public Health Emergency Response Systems. Health Communication 29(6): 598–609. 10.1080/10410236.2013.785474. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources