[Intrauterine fetal weight assessment using ultrasound. A comparison of several weight assessment methods and development of a new formula for the determination of fetal weight]
- PMID: 3283926
- DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1011588
[Intrauterine fetal weight assessment using ultrasound. A comparison of several weight assessment methods and development of a new formula for the determination of fetal weight]
Abstract
At the Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of the University of Mainz, the foetal weights were estimated in 196 foetuses between 24 and 42 weeks of gestation. All estimates were based on sonographic determination 0-6 days prior to delivery. In a prospective study the equations of Hansmann, Schillinger et al., Campbell and Wilkin, Warsof et al., Shepard et al., Higginbottom et al., Thurnau et al. and an own unpublished formula of Merz were compared. In addition, with the aid of computer analysis, a new equation for predicting foetal weight was evolved from the data measured in this study. This formula should be valid for all weight groups. In 25.5% of the newborn the actual birth weights ranged from 610 to 2499 g, in 42.9% from 2500 to 3499 g and in 31.6% from 3500 to 4520 g. On comparing the individual equations for the entire study group, the most reliable formulas for estimating foetal weights were found to be those of Shepard et al. (72.4%), Hansmann (61.2%) and Merz (61.2%). In the very low birth-weight range less than 2500 g the formula of Shepard et al. proved to be the most reliable for estimating foetal weight with 72%. In the group between 2500 and 3499 g reliability in estimating foetal weight was over 60% with the equations of Shepard et al. (72.6%), Hansmann (67.9%) and Merz (61.9%). In the birth-weight group of 3500 to 4520 g the most reliable formula for predicting foetal weight was found to be that of Schillinger et al. (91.9%), Hansmann (83.9%), Shepard et al. (72.6%) and Merz (69.4%). The formula which was derived from own data was as follows: W (g) = -3200.40479 + 157.07186 AC (cm) + 15.90391 (BPD)2 (cm). With this formula we obtained 71.4% reliability in predicting foetal weight with a mean absolute weight difference of 221 g for the complete study group. Are of validity for this formula could be defined as follows: BPD 7.0-10.5 cm AC 21.8-36.5 cm (all measurements from outer to outer margin).
Similar articles
-
Fetal weight estimation by 2D and 3D ultrasound: comparison of six formulas.Ultraschall Med. 2009 Dec;30(6):585-90. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1109185. Epub 2009 Jun 18. Ultraschall Med. 2009. PMID: 19544232
-
Accuracy and modifying factors for ultrasonographic determination of fetal weight at term.Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Dec;84(6):926-30. Obstet Gynecol. 1994. PMID: 7970471
-
Prediction of birth weight by ultrasound in Turkish population. Which formula should be used in Turkey to estimate fetal weight?Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005 Dec;31(12):1577-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.07.017. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2005. PMID: 16344119
-
Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):365-70. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8355935 Review.
-
Biometric assessment.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;23(6):819-31. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.06.007. Epub 2009 Jul 26. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2009. PMID: 19632901 Review.
Cited by
-
Ultrasound (in)accuracy: it's in the formulae not in the technique - assessment of accuracy of abdominal circumference measurement in term pregnancies.Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2014 Feb;17(1):38-44. doi: 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2014.tb00083.x. Epub 2015 Dec 31. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2014. PMID: 28191205 Free PMC article.
-
Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Dec;298(6):1101-1106. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4917-z. Epub 2018 Oct 4. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018. PMID: 30284620 Free PMC article.
-
Partial dependence of ultrasonically estimated fetal weight on biometric parameters.R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jun 18;12(6):250172. doi: 10.1098/rsos.250172. eCollection 2025 Jun. R Soc Open Sci. 2025. PMID: 40535947 Free PMC article.
-
New MRI Criteria for Successful Vaginal Breech Delivery in Primiparae.PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0161028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0161028. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27532122 Free PMC article.
-
Development of birth weight estimation model for Ethiopian population from sonographic evaluation.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Dec 11;23(1):850. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-06145-9. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 38082249 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical