Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Apr;25(4):2119-2127.
doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03524-w. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

Do different cone beam computed tomography exposure protocols influence subjective image quality prior to and after root canal treatment?

Andy Wai Kan Yeung  1 , Basak Harper  1 , Chengfei Zhang  2 , Prasanna Neelakantan  2 , Michael M Bornstein  3   4
Affiliations

Do different cone beam computed tomography exposure protocols influence subjective image quality prior to and after root canal treatment?

Andy Wai Kan Yeung et al. Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

Objectives: The current study aimed to evaluate different CBCT exposure protocols and influencing factors affecting the subjective image quality of scans taken for endodontic indications.

Materials and methods: Twelve extracted teeth, comprising of two sets of maxillary molars, premolars, canines and incisors, mandibular premolars, and molars, were endodontically treated, and either received a fiber or metal post. The teeth were scanned by CBCT imaging before and after root canal treatment, and after post insertion. Each scan was performed thrice, using an ultra low dose (ULD), standard (SM), and high-resolution mode (HR), respectively. Twelve observers-4 endodontists, 4 periodontists, and 4 radiologists-assessed the subjective image quality using visual analogue scales (VAS). Potential influencing factors were evaluated including acquisition mode, observer specialty, stage of treatment, type of post, and type of tooth, using one-way ANOVA and T test.

Results: Teeth scanned with the ULD had the highest average VAS score (72.5), followed by HR (70.2), and SM (69.0) for values pooled from all teeth and observers. CBCT acquisition mode was not a significant influencing factor on the VAS scores. Observer specialty, stage of treatment, type of post, and type of tooth were significant influencing factors.

Conclusions: Based on the present in vitro data, a low-dose CBCT mode seems not to negatively affect the perception of image quality.

Clinical relevance: The findings from this in vitro study demonstrate that a low-dose CBCT mode might have potential for diagnostics prior to or following endodontic treatment.

Keywords: Cone beam computed tomography; Dose optimization; Image quality; Low dose; Root canal treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow-chart illustrating the workflow for the 12 teeth processed and analyzed
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Representative image of the six teeth from one group mounted in a customized silicone mold simulating soft tissues prior to root canal treatment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative CBCT images of a mandibular premolar before root canal treatment with a ultra low dose mode (ULD), b standard mode (SM), and c high-resolution mode (HR), and after root canal treatment with d ULD, e SM, and f HR. Furthermore, a maxillary canine is depicted with an inserted metal post using g ULD, h SM, and i HR, and with a fiber post using j ULD, k SM, and l HR
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Omer O, Al Shalabi R, Jennings M, Glennon J, Claffey N. A comparison between clearing and radiographic techniques in the study of the root-canal anatomy of maxillary first and second molars. Int Endod J. 2004;37(5):291–296. doi: 10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00731.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Velvart P, Hecker H, Tillinger G. Detection of the apical lesion and the mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92(6):682–688. doi: 10.1067/moe.2001.118904. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tamse A, Fuss Z, Lustig J, Kaplavi J. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertically fractured teeth. J Endod. 1999;25(7):506–508. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(99)80292-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kersten DD, Mines P, Sweet M. Use of the microscope in endodontics: results of a questionnaire. J Endod. 2008;34(7):804–807. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.04.002. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: Part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J. 2009;42(6):463–475. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01531.x. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources