Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;184(2):499-505.
doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05873-2. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

Increasing accrual of minority patients in breast cancer clinical trials

Affiliations

Increasing accrual of minority patients in breast cancer clinical trials

Amelia A Trant et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Black and Hispanic patients participate in clinical trials at lower rates than white patients nationally; lack of diversity in clinical trials prevents appropriate safety and efficacy testing of new treatments in these populations.

Methods: The Oncology Welcomes New Haven into Trials (OWN IT) initiative at the Yale Cancer Center used a multi-tiered approach to improve breast cancer minority clinical trial accrual through community focus groups, ongoing community outreach, institutional executive council representation, grand rounds presentation, and didactic lectures with healthcare providers. Eligibility criteria of breast cancer trials at Smilow Cancer Center were reviewed using clinicaltrials.gov. Also, an anonymous, 5-min survey was conducted at regular visits with Smilow Breast Center patients to gauge awareness of and access to clinical trials. Survey data were compared to the Yale Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office, Connecticut Tumor Registry, and U.S. Census records. Two-tailed Fisher's tests were used for all analyses.

Results: There was a significant increase in the number of minority patients who participated in clinical trials at Smilow Cancer Center from 2016 (95/750) to 2018 (155/944) (p = 0.0325). Two hundred patients participated in the survey; response rate 92%. There was no significant difference in the rate at which patients were invited to participate in clinical trials or the rate at which they declined to participate based on race or ethnicity. Black and Hispanic patients were significantly less likely to be aware of clinical trials than white patients (p < .001). The review of eligibility criteria showed that over half of the studies reviewed had restrictions regarding increased liver function tests, and many restricted the participation of patients with other chronic conditions.

Conclusions: Low participation in clinical trials among black and Hispanic patients is likely multifaceted. This study indicated that there are likely structural factors at work which can be modified with institutional effort. The role of patient education regarding clinical trials and accrual should be studied further as should eligibility criteria as a potential barrier to participation.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Clinical trials; Eligibility criteria; Health disparities.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Carson P, Ziesche S, Johnson G, Cohn JN (1999) Racial differences in response to therapy for heart failure: analysis of the vasodilator-heart failure trials. Vasodilator-heart failure trial study group. J Card Fail 5(3):178–187 - DOI
    1. Ramamoorthy A, Pacanowski MA, Bull J, Zhang L (2015) Racial/ethnic differences in drug disposition and response: review of recently approved drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 97(3):263–273 - DOI
    1. Wright JT Jr, Dunn JK, Cutler JA, Davis BR, Cushman WC, Ford CE et al (2005) Outcomes in hypertensive black and nonblack patients treated with chlorthalidone, amlodipine, and lisinopril. JAMA 293(13):1595–1608 - DOI
    1. McCarthy CR (1994) Historical background of clinical trials involving women and minorities. Acad Med 69(9):695–698 - DOI
    1. Coakley M, Fadiran EO, Parrish LJ, Griffith RA, Weiss E, Carter C (2012) Dialogues on diversifying clinical trials: successful strategies for engaging women and minorities in clinical trials. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 21(7):713–716 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources