Pregnancy Outcomes of Single/Double Blastocysts and Cleavage Embryo Transfers: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 24,422 Frozen-Thawed Cycles
- PMID: 32840740
- PMCID: PMC7593290
- DOI: 10.1007/s43032-020-00247-x
Pregnancy Outcomes of Single/Double Blastocysts and Cleavage Embryo Transfers: a Retrospective Cohort Study of 24,422 Frozen-Thawed Cycles
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effect of blastocyst- and cleavage-stage embryo transfers with different numbers of transferred embryos on pregnancy outcomes in China. This was a retrospective cohort study that collected 24,422 frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles in two affiliated hospitals of Peking University Health Science Center between January 2015 and May 2018. They were divided into four groups: the single cleavage-stage embryo transfer group (C-1) (763 cycles), double cleavage-stage embryo transfer group (C-2) (13,004 cycles), single blastocyst-stage embryo transfer group (B-1) (7913 cycles), and double blastocyst-stage embryo transfer group (B-2) (2046 cycles). Of the four groups, the live birth rate was the lowest in the C-1 group (11.8%) while it was the highest in the B-2 group (33.6%). However, the B-2 group was accompanied with higher risks of miscarriages, maternal complications, twin births, preterm births, and low birth weight. Compared with the C-2 group, the B-1 group had a lower live birth rate (23.0 vs 29.0%; aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.85), but also had a lower risk for twin births (1.9 vs 23.4%; aOR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.04-0.09) and preterm births (9.6 vs 16.1%; aOR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.65). The probability of live birth in the B-1 group declined from 0.25 at 20-29 years old to 0.08 at > 40 years old, while the probabilities of adverse outcomes went up with maternal age. It can be concluded that single-blastocyst embryo transfer seems to be the best choice for all maternal ages. This group of embryo transfer has significantly reduced adverse neonatal outcomes. Especially, women with younger maternal age in this group appear to prominently benefit from single-blastocyst transfer.
Keywords: Double-cleavage embryo transfer; Single-blastocyst embryo transfer; Transfer strategy.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Glujovsky D, Blake D, Farquhar C. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;6:CD002118. - PubMed
-
- Maheshwari A, McLernon D, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus? Hum Reprod. 2015;30(12):2703–2707. - PubMed
-
- Korkmaz C, Gül Yıldız Ü, Fidan U, Baykal B, Temel Ceyhan S, Ağaçayak E. Investigation of transfer results of human embryos that were vitrified and thawed at the cleavage, morula and blastocyst stages. Zygote. 2020:1–5. - PubMed
-
- Kontopoulos G, Simopoulou M, Zervomanolakis I, Prokopakis T, Dimitropoulos K, Dedoulis E, Grigorakis S, Agapitou K, Nikitos E, Rapani A, Vlahos N. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in oocyte donation cycles. Medicina (Kaunas) 2019;55(6):293. doi: 10.3390/medicina55060293. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
