Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Dec;48(6):464-470.
doi: 10.1111/cdoe.12573. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

What is intersectionality and why is it important in oral health research?

Affiliations
Review

What is intersectionality and why is it important in oral health research?

Vanessa Elaine Muirhead et al. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

This paper is the second of two reviews that seek to stimulate debate on new and neglected avenues in oral health research. The first commissioned narrative review, "Inclusion oral health: Advancing a theoretical framework for policy, research and practice", published in February 2020, explored social exclusion, othering and intersectionality. In it, we argued that people who experience social exclusion face a "triple threat": they are separated from mainstream society, stigmatized by the dental profession, and severed from wider health and social care systems because of the disconnection between oral health and general health. We proposed a definition of inclusion oral health and a theoretical framework to advance the policy, research and practice agenda. This second review delves further into the concept of intersectionality, arguing that individuals who are socially excluded experience multiple forms of discrimination, stigma and disadvantage that reflect intersecting social identities. We first provide a theoretical and historical overview of intersectionality, rooted in Black feminist ideologies in the United States. Our working definition of intersectionality, requiring the simultaneous appreciation of multiple social identities, an examination of power and inequality, and a recognition of changing social contexts, then sets the scene for examining existing applications of intersectionality in oral health research. A critique of the sparse application of intersectionality in oral health research highlights missed opportunities and shortcomings related to paradigmatic and epistemological differences, a lack of robust theoretically engaged quantitative and mixed methods research, and a failure to sufficiently consider power from an intersectionality perspective. The final section proposes a framework to guide future oral health research that embraces an intersectionality agenda consisting of descriptive research to deepen our understanding of intersectionality, and transformative research to tackle social injustice and inequities through participatory research and co-production.

Keywords: inclusion oral health; inequalities; intersectionality; social identity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Marmot M. Social determinants of health inequalities. Lancet. 2005;365(9464):1099-1104.
    1. Else-Quest NM, Hyde JS. Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research:II. Methods and Techniques . Psychol Women Q. 2016;40(3):319-336.
    1. International Centre for Oral Health Inequalities Research and Policy. Social inequalities in oral health: from evidence to action University College London; 2015.
    1. Petersen PE, Kwan S. Equity, social determinants and public health programmes-the case of oral health. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2011;39(6):481-487.
    1. Marcenes W, Muirhead VE, Murray S, Redshaw P, Bennett U, Wright D. Ethnic disparities in the oral health of three- to four-year-old children in East London. Br Dent J. 2013;215(2):E4.

LinkOut - more resources