Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb;35(2):e4970.
doi: 10.1002/bmc.4970. Epub 2020 Sep 6.

Automated sample preparation for the detection and confirmation of hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizers in urine

Affiliations

Automated sample preparation for the detection and confirmation of hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizers in urine

Laurie De Wilde et al. Biomed Chromatogr. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

As hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizers (HIFs) can artificially enhance an athlete's erythropoiesis, the World Anti-Doping Agency prohibits their use at all times. Every urine sample for doping control analysis has to be evaluated for the presence of HIFs and therefore sensitive methods that allow high sample throughput are needed. Samples suspicious for the presence of HIFs need to be confirmed following the identification criteria established by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Previous work has shown the advantages of using turbulent flow online solid-phase extraction (SPE) procedures to reduce matrix effects and retention time shifts. Furthermore, the use of online SPE allows for automation and high sample throughput. Both an initial testing procedure (ITP) and a confirmation method were developed and validated, using online SPE liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), with limits of detection between 0.1 ng/ml (or possibly lower) and 4 ng/ml (or higher for GSK360a) and limits of identification between 0.1 ng/ml (or possibly lower) and 1.17 ng/ml. The ITP only takes 6.5 min per sample. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first ITP and confirmation methods that include more than three HIFs without the need for manual sample preparation.

Keywords: LC-MS/MS; doping; hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizers; turbulent flow online SPE; urine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Abushareeda, W., Vonaparti, A., Al Saad, K., Almansoori, M., Meloug, M., Saleh, A., … Georgakopoulos, C. (2018). High resolution full scan liquid chromatography mass spectrometry comprehensive screening in sports antidoping urine analysis. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 151, 10-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2017.12.025
    1. Asakawa, Y., Ozawa, C., Osada, K., Kaneko, S., & Asakawa, N. (2007). Reduction of carry-over in column-switching HPLC/MS system with automated system washing procedure for highly sensitive direct analysis of donepezil in dog plasma. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 43(2), 683-690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpba.2006.08.007
    1. Badoud, F., Grata, E., Perrenoud, L., Avois, L., Saugy, M., Rudaz, S., & Veuthey, J. L. (2009). Fast analysis of doping agents in urine by ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. I. Screening analysis. Journal of Chromatography A, 1216(20), 4423-4433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.03.033
    1. Badoud, F., Guillarme, D., Boccard, J., Grata, E., Saugy, M., Rudaz, S., & Veuthey, J. L. (2011). Analytical aspects in doping control: Challenges and perspectives. Forensic Science International, 213(1-3), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.024
    1. Beuck, S., Schänzer, W., & Thevis, M. (2012). Hypoxia-inducible factor stabilizers and other small-molecule erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in current and preventive doping analysis. Drug Testing and Analysis, 4(11), 830-845. https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.390

LinkOut - more resources