Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov;29(11):1943-1950.
doi: 10.1002/pon.5528. Epub 2020 Sep 27.

Patient and proxy reports regarding the experience of treatment decision-making in cancer care

Affiliations

Patient and proxy reports regarding the experience of treatment decision-making in cancer care

Jessica K Roydhouse et al. Psychooncology. 2020 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: Shared decision-making, including the elicitation of patient preferences regarding treatment decisions, is considered part of high-quality cancer care. However, patients may not be able to self-report due to illness, and therefore proxy reports may be used. We sought to determine the difference between proxy and patient reports about patient decisions and preferences among patients who received or were scheduled for chemotherapy using data from a large, population-based survey of patients with incident lung or colorectal cancer.

Methods: Of 3573 patients who received or were scheduled for chemotherapy, 3108 self-reported and 465 had proxies reporting on their behalf about preferred and actual decision roles regarding this treatment. Preferred and actual decision roles were assessed using the Control Preferences Scale, and categorized as shared, patient-controlled, or doctor-controlled. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the association between patient and proxy responses and whether preferences were met. The models adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables and patient/proxy-reported health status.

Results: Sixty-three percent of all respondents reported actual roles in decisions that matched their preferred roles (role attainment). Proxies and patients were similarly likely to report role attainment (65% vs 63%). In adjusted analyses, proxies were more likely report role attainment (OR = 1.27, 95%CI = 1.02-1.59), but this difference was smaller if health variables were excluded from the model (OR = 1.14, 95%CI = 0.92-1.41).

Conclusion: Most patients' preferences for treatment participation were met. Surveys from proxies appear to yield small differences on the reports of attainment of preferred treatment decision-making roles in cancer care vs surveys from patients.

Keywords: cancer; oncology; patient experience; proxy; psycho-oncology; shared decision-making; treatment preference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Drs Roydhouse, Keating and Wilson have nothing to declare. Dr Gutman reports personal fees from Johnson & Johnson/Janssen, outside the submitted work. Dr Kehl reports paid consulting for Aetion, outside the submitted work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Institute of Medicine. Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2013. - PubMed
    1. Keating NL, Guadagnoli E, Landrum MB, Borbas C, Weeks JC. Treatment decision making in early-stage breast cancer: should surgeons match patients’ desired level of involvement? J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(6): 1473–1479. - PubMed
    1. Kehl KL, Landrum MB, Arora NK, et al. Association of actual and preferred decision roles with patient-reported quality of care: shared decision making in cancer care. JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(1):50–58. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atherton PJ, Smith T, Singh JA, et al. The relation between cancer patient treatment decision-making roles and quality of life. Cancer. 2013;119(12):2342–2349. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Graham C Incidence and impact of proxy response in measuring patient experience: secondary analysis of a large postal survey using propensity score matching. Int J Qual Health Care. 2016;28(2): 246–252. - PubMed

Publication types