Prognostic Relevance of Macrophage Phenotypes in High-grade Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinomas
- PMID: 32842026
- DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000867
Prognostic Relevance of Macrophage Phenotypes in High-grade Oral Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinomas
Abstract
Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are part of the tumor microenvironment, broadly divided into M1 and M2 phenotypes. M1 macrophages, commonly identified by staining the CD11c antigen, have an antitumour immunity role, while M2 macrophages, expressing the CD163 antigen, are involved in tumor progression. Little is known about M1 and M2 phenotypes in the context of the oral tongue squamous cell carcinomas (OTSCC), a subgroup of oral cancer with peculiar clinical behavior. This study evaluated the macrophage polarization in OTSCC specimens to examine their prognostic relevance. To this end, specimens from 71 OTSCC patients graded as G1 or G3 were investigated for CD11c and CD163 expression. Immunohistochemical staining of TAMs was evaluated in tumor nests, tumor inflammation area (TIA), and tumor stroma. To analyze the expression of CD11c and CD163, the percentage of positive cells was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (<10%), 2 (11% to 50%), 3 (51% to 80%), and 4 (>80%). The staining intensity was scored as 0 (negative), 1 (weak), 2 (moderate), and 3 (intense). Higher expression of both CD163+ and CD11c+ macrophages in inflammation area positively correlated with G3 grade, both in extension and intensity. Focusing on G3 tumors, survival curves showed better disease-free survival in patients with high CD11c expression in the TIA. Presence of CD163 expression in TIA was associated with worse disease-free survival. This study evaluated, for the first time, the distribution of M1 and M2 macrophages in relation to the pathologic grade in OTSCC, highlighting the prognostic relevance of analyzing the localization of TAMs.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Amin MB, Greene FL, Edge SB, et al. The Eighth Edition AJCC Cancer Staging Manual: continuing to build a bridge from a population-based to a more “personalized” approach to cancer staging. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67:93–99.
-
- Mascitti M, Rubini C, De Michele F, et al. American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system 7th ed versus 8th ed: any improvement for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2018;126:415–423.
-
- Wagner VP, Webber LP, Curra M, et al. Bryne’s grading system predicts poor disease-specific survival of oral squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative study among different histologic grading systems. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2017;123:688–696.
-
- Barnes L, Eveson JW, Reichart P, Sidransky D, eds. Pathology and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumours. Lyon, France: IARC Press; 2005.
-
- Locati M, Mantovani A, Sica A. Macrophage activation and polarization as an adaptive component of innate immunity. Adv Immunol. 2013;120:163–184.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials