Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2020 Aug 26;15(1):352.
doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01842-z.

Dynamic hip screws versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Dynamic hip screws versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lang Li et al. J Orthop Surg Res. .

Abstract

Objective: Dynamic hip screw (DHS) and cannulated screws (CS) are widely used for femoral neck fractures. However, there is no definite result as to which surgical method bring less complications. We performed this study to compare the complication (mortality, non-union, avascular necrosis (AVN), and revision) of DHS and CS for the treatment of femoral neck fractures patients.

Methods: We searched Pubmed, Ovid, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and other relevant studies related the comparison of DHS versus CS for femoral neck fractures from inception to Jan 7, 2020. The quality of the included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Newcastle-Ottawa (NOS), respectively. The meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan 5.2 software.

Results: Nine RCTs and seven retrospective cohort studies were included for meta-analysis. CS was found to be superior to DHS with respect to AVN rate (OR 1.47; 95% CI 1.08-1.99; p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to mortality, non-union, and revision (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: DHS and CS have similar complication including mortality, revision rate, and non-union, but CS has superior to DHS on ANV. However, further studies are required to provide more robust evidence owing to some limitations.

Keywords: Cannulated screws; Dynamic hip screw; Femoral neck fractures; Meta-analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the selection process of the studies included for the meta-analysis
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Quality assessment of risk of bias in the studies included
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Forest plot of odds ratio with confidence intervals for mortality
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of odds ratio with confidence intervals for non-union
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Forest plot of odds ratio with confidence intervals for AVN. a meta-analysis of AVN. b sensitive analysis of AVN
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Forest plot of odds ratio with confidence intervals for revision
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Publication bias of mortality

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Singer BR, McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, Christie J. Epidemiology of fractures in 15,000 adults: the influence of age and gender. J Bone Jnt Surg Brit Vol. 1998;80(2):243–248. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.80B2.0800243. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC, Browner WS, Stone K, Fox KM, Ensrud KE, et al. Risk factors for hip fracture in white women. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. N Engl J Med. 1995;332(12):767–773. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199503233321202. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dickson JA. The unsolved fracture; a protest against defeatism. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1953;35-a(4):805–822. doi: 10.2106/00004623-195335040-00001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jansen H, Frey SP, Meffert RH. Subtrochanteric fracture: a rare but severe complication after screw fixation of femoral neck fractures in the elderly. Acta Orthop Belg. 2010;76(6):778–784. - PubMed
    1. Dedrick DK, Mackenzie JR, Burney RE. Complications of femoral neck fracture in young adults. J Trauma. 1986;26(10):932–937. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198610000-00013. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms