Comparison of norfloxacin with cotrimoxazole for infection prophylaxis in acute leukemia. The trade-off for reduced gram-negative sepsis

Abstract

A total of 63 neutropenic patients receiving cytotoxic therapy for acute leukemia were randomly allocated to receive norfloxacin (400 mg every 12 hours) or cotrimoxazole (160/800 mg every 12 hours) to prevent bacterial infection. Compliance was more than 95 percent and no adverse effects attributable to the study drugs were observed. The overall incidence of febrile illness (67 percent) was similar between the groups; however, no gram-negative bacillary infections were observed in 31 norfloxacin recipients compared with four of 32 cotrimoxazole recipients. Furthermore, nine norfloxacin recipients had 17 gram-positive bacteremias compared with two in two cotrimoxazole recipients (p = 0.0034). Norfloxacin was more effective than cotrimoxazole for preventing acquisition of aerobic gram-negative bacilli in surveillance cultures. Neither study drug allocation nor the presence of an indwelling central venous catheter influenced outcome among the 42 patients who subsequently received empiric systemic antibiotics for suspected infection. Although gram-positive infection remains an unsolved problem, norfloxacin appears to be a safe, effective, well-tolerated alternative to cotrimoxazole for preventing gram-negative infection in neutropenic patients with acute leukemia.