Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Aug;5(8):e002766.
doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002766.

Allocating resources to support universal health coverage: policy processes and implementation in Malawi

Pakwanja Twea  1 , Gerald Manthalu  1 , Sakshi Mohan  2
Affiliations
Review

Allocating resources to support universal health coverage: policy processes and implementation in Malawi

Pakwanja Twea et al. BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug.

Abstract

Optimising the use of limited health resources in low-income and middle-income countries towards the maximisation of health outcomes requires efficient distribution of resources across health services and geographical areas. While technical research exists on how efficiencies can be achieved in resource allocation, there is limited guidance on the policy processes required to convert these technical inputs into practicable solutions. In this article, we discuss Malawi's experience in 2019 of revising its resource allocation formula (RAF) for the geographical distribution of the government health sector budget to the decentralised units in-charge of delivering primary and secondary healthcare. The policy process to revise the RAF in Malawi was initiated by district assemblies seeking a more equitable distribution of government resources, with the Ministry of Health and Population (MOHP) leading the technical and deliberative work. This article discusses all the steps undertaken by MOHP, Malawi to date as well as the steps necessary looking forward to legally establish the newly developed RAF and to start implementing it. We highlight the practical and political considerations in ensuring the acceptability and implementation feasibility of a revised RAF. It is hoped that this discussion will serve as guidance to other countries undergoing a revision of their resource allocation frameworks.

Keywords: health economics; health policy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process of revising a resource allocation formula. RAF, resource allocation formula.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anselmi L, Lagarde M, Hanson K. Equity in the allocation of public sector financial resources in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review. Health Policy Plan 2015;30:528–45. 10.1093/heapol/czu034 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McIntyre D, Chitah B, Mabandi L, et al. . Progress towards equitable health care resource allocation in East and southern Africa. Regional Network for Equity in Health in East and Southern Africa 2007.
    1. Nyamhanga T, Fruemnce G, Mwang M, et al. . Achievements and challenges of resource allocation for health in a decentralized system in Tanzania: perspectives of national and district level officers. East Afr J Public Health 2013;10:416–27. - PubMed
    1. Pearson M. Allocating public resources for health: developing pro-poor approaches. London: DFID Health Systems Resource Centre, 2002.
    1. Smith PC. Formula funding of public services: an economic analysis. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 2003;19:301–22. 10.1093/oxrep/19.2.301 - DOI

Publication types