Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jan-Mar;14(1):72-74.
doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_14_20. Epub 2020 Mar 25.

To Compare the Changes in Hemodynamic Parameters and Blood Loss during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy - General Anesthesia versus Subarachnoid Block

Affiliations

To Compare the Changes in Hemodynamic Parameters and Blood Loss during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy - General Anesthesia versus Subarachnoid Block

Ravi Ranjan et al. Anesth Essays Res. 2020 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is done under general anesthesia (GA) in most of the centers. However, associated complications and cost are higher for GA than for regional anesthesia.

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of GA versus subarachnoid block (SAB) with regard to intraoperative blood loss and postoperative drop in hemoglobin (Hb) in patients undergoing PCNL.

Setting and design: This prospective, randomized, comparative clinical trial was carried out at a tertiary care hospital. After obtaining the institute ethical committee clearance (vide no 57/15), patients were randomly allocated into two groups using table of randomization (n = 30 each), Group A - GA, Group B - SAB.

Materials and methods: Intraoperative blood loss was assessed by measuring the Hb of irrigated fluid and postoperative drop in Hb concentration. Other parameters such as intraoperative mean arterial pressure and heart rate were also compared in these groups.

Statistical analysis: The results are presented in frequencies, percentages, and mean ± standard deviation. The Chi-square test was used to compare the categorical variables between the groups. Unpaired t-test was used to compare the continuous variables between the groups.

Results: Hemodynamic parameters were similar in both the groups preoperatively. The Hb drop was significant in Group A (1.28 ± 0.35 g.dl-1) as compared to Group B (1.10 ± 0.67 g.dl-1). On calculating Hb in irrigated fluid-blood mixture, it was found to be significantly higher in Group A (1.87 ± 0.44 g.L-1) as compared to Group B (1.25 ± 0.25 g.L-1).

Conclusions: Both GA and SAB are effective and safe in PCNL. However, SAB is associated with less blood loss as estimated by intraoperative blood loss and Hb drop.

Keywords: Blood loss; general anesthesia; hemodynamics; nephrolithiasis; percutaneous nephrolithotomy; subarachnoid block.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Singh V, Sinha RJ, Sankhwar SN, Malik A. A prospective randomized study comparing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia. Urol Int. 2011;87:293–8. - PubMed
    1. Dalela D, Goel A, Singh P, Shankhwar SN. Renal capsular block: A novel method for performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local anesthesia. J Endourol. 2004;18:544–6. - PubMed
    1. Tangpaitoon T, Nisoog C, Lojanapiwat B. Efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): A prospective and randomized study comparing regional epidural anesthesia with general anesthesia. Int Braz J Urol. 2012;38:504–11. - PubMed
    1. Elbealy M, Rashwan D, Kassim SA, Abbas S. A comparison of the effects of epidural anesthesia, lumber paravertebral block and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Med Sci. 2008;8:170–6.
    1. Ferreyra G, Long Y, Ranieri VM. Respiratory complications after major surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15:342–8. - PubMed