Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018;1(1):10.15695/jstem/v1i1.19.
doi: 10.15695/jstem/v1i1.19. Epub 2018 Sep 24.

Demonstrating the Efficacy of the Health Sciences and Technology Academy: Using Archival Standardized Test Scores to Analyze an OST College-Preparatory Program for Underserved Youth

Affiliations

Demonstrating the Efficacy of the Health Sciences and Technology Academy: Using Archival Standardized Test Scores to Analyze an OST College-Preparatory Program for Underserved Youth

Feon M Smith et al. J STEM Outreach. 2018.

Abstract

To combat educational and health disparities, out-of-school-time (OST) STEM enrichment programs provide services to underserved youth to encourage them to pursue college and health careers. This article describes a study conducted to determine if the Health Sciences and Technology Academy (HSTA) program participants who receive year-round educational interventions to prepare them for STEM and health sciences majors performed better on the West Virginia Educational Standards Test (WESTEST2) than non-participants. This study provides descriptive and inferential statistics, specifically one-way ANOVAs with one-to-one matching based on grade level, gender, race, and GPA at the end of the 8th grade year for 336 students. Statistically significant differences were found favoring HSTA participants on the WESTEST2 math and reading/language scores.

Keywords: at risk students; out-of-school-time programs; standardized test; statistical analysis; stem enrichment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
*p = .001, **p=.001
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
*p = .022, **p=.006.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
*p = .005, **p=.017.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
*p = .028, **p=.022.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
*p=not significant, **p=not significant.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
*p = .040, **p = not significant.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
*p = not significant, **p = .012
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
HSTA’s Social Support Structure

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afterschool Alliance. (2015). Evaluations Backgrounder: A Summary of Formal Evaluations of Afterschool programs’ Impact on Academics, Behavior, Safety and Family Life. Retrieved March 9, 2018 from http://afterschoolalliance.org//documents/Evaluation_Backgrounder.pdf
    1. Berliner DC (2009). Poverty and Potential: Out-of-School Factors and School Success. Boulder and Tempe: Education and the Public Interest Center & Education Policy Research Unit; Retrieved March 8, 2018 from http://nepc.colorado.edu/publication/poverty-and-potential
    1. Carter FD, Mandell M, and Maton KI (2009). The Influence of On-Campus, Academic Year Undergraduate Research on STEM Ph.D. Outcomes: Evidence From the Meyerhoff Scholarship Program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 441–462. doi:10.3102/0162373709348584 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Civil Rights Act. (1964). Public Law 88–352. Retrieved March 9, 2018 from http://library.clerk.house.gov/referencefiles/PPL_CivilRightsAct_1964.pdf
    1. Cohen GL, and Garcia J (2005). “I am us”: Negative Stereotypes as Collective Threats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 566–82. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.566. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources