Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;41(1):163-172.
doi: 10.1007/s10792-020-01563-6. Epub 2020 Aug 25.

Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses

Affiliations

Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses

Laureano A Rementería-Capelo et al. Int Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: To report visual outcomes and patient-perceived satisfaction after trifocal or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a real-world scenario.

Methods: Three months after bilateral cataract surgery, corrected and uncorrected visual acuity for far, intermediate and near distances and binocular defocus curves and contrast sensitivity were measured. The patients also completed the Catquest SF-9 questionnaire and reported on dysphotopsia and spectacle use.

Results: There were 23 patients in the Symfony, 32 patients in the Finevision and 36 patients in the Panoptix group. The percentage of eyes receiving a toric IOL was 41.2%. There were no differences in uncorrected binocular visual acuities, save for near vision, which was lower in the Symfony group. Binocular defocus curves for the trifocal IOLS were almost identical, while vision achieved with the Symfony IOL was significantly lower starting at - 1.5 D defocus. Contrast sensitivity, as well as the perception of halos and glare and the difficulty for night-driving was similar for all groups, except for contrast sensitivity at 6 cycles per degree, which was lower in the Symfony group compared to both Finevision and Panoptix. For near vision, only 47.6% of the Symfony patients reported being completely spectacle-free, compared to 93.3% and 94.4% for the Finevision and Panoptix groups.

Conclusions: Clinically relevant differences were only detected for near vision, with lower values for EDOF IOLs. In order to achieve patient satisfaction, it is imperative to explain the results expected with each IOL; for EDOF IOLs, patients should be advised that they may require near-spectacle correction.

Keywords: Cataract surgery; Extended-depth of focus; Intraocular lens; Trifocal.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Carballo-Alvarez J, Vazquez-Molini JM, Sanz-Fernandez JC et al (2015) Visual outcomes after bilateral trifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation. BMC Ophthalmol 15:26. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0012-4.:26-0012 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
    1. Cochener B, Vryghem J, Rozot P et al (2014) Clinical outcomes with a trifocal intraocular lens: a multicenter study. J Refract Surg 30:762–768 - DOI
    1. Gatinel D, Pagnoulle C, Houbrechts Y, Gobin L (2011) Design and qualification of a diffractive trifocal optical profile for intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 37:2060–2067 - DOI
    1. Alba-Bueno F, Vega F, Millan MS (2014) Halos and multifocal intraocular lenses: origin and interpretation. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 89:397–404 - DOI
    1. Gibbons A, Ali TK, Waren DP, Donaldson KE (2016) Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 10:1965–1970 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources