Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1988 Mar;32(3):298-302.
doi: 10.1128/AAC.32.3.298.

Effect of protein binding on serum bactericidal activities of ceftazidime and cefoperazone in healthy volunteers

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Effect of protein binding on serum bactericidal activities of ceftazidime and cefoperazone in healthy volunteers

Y W Lam et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1988 Mar.

Abstract

The effect of protein binding on antibiotic efficacy is controversial. The pharmacologic effect of an antibiotic is believed to be related to its unbound concentration at the site of infection. It is unknown whether antibiotics with a low degree of serum protein binding are clinically superior to antibiotics that are highly protein bound. In a randomized, crossover investigation, the serum bactericidal activities of a single dose of ceftazidime (30 mg/kg) and cefoperazone (30 mg/kg) were studied in six healthy volunteers against three clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa for which both antibiotics had similar MICs and MBCs. Serum samples were collected over 12 h. The total and unbound antibiotic concentrations were determined by high-pressure liquid chromatography. Mean peak total concentrations of ceftazidime and cefoperazone in serum were 101.7 +/- 18.6 and 264.1 +/- 149.6 micrograms/ml, respectively. Due to its lower protein binding (21 +/- 6%), ceftazidime had significantly higher unbound concentrations in serum than did the highly bound cefoperazone (91.5 +/- 2%). Mean peak unbound concentrations were 78.5 +/- 12.5 and 24.2 +/- 17.8 micrograms/ml for ceftazidime and cefoperazone, respectively. The unbound concentration of ceftazidime at each sampling time was higher than that of cefoperazone. Although total concentrations were consistently higher than the MICs, serum containing cefoperazone showed minimal bactericidal activity against the isolates. In contrast, despite lower total concentrations, ceftazidime had greater antibacterial activity than cefoperazone. Serum bactericidal activity was more closely related to unbound rather than total antibiotic concentrations. Our data support the concept that only the unbound drug is microbiologically active.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Rev Infect Dis. 1981 Jan-Feb;3(1):28-37 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1972 Nov;126(5):492-7 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1980 Jul;142(1):77-82 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Jun;21(6):873-80 - PubMed
    1. J Infect Dis. 1978 May;137 Suppl:S161-S168 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources