Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Jan;31(1):267-273.
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04932-3. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique. Does It Matter? Weight Loss and Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Affiliations

Gastrojejunal Anastomotic Technique. Does It Matter? Weight Loss and Weight Regain 5 Years After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Matyas Fehervari et al. Obes Surg. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Purpose: The gastrojejunostomy during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) can be constructed by hand sewn (HSA), linear (LSA) and circular (CSA) stapler technique. They are all considered safe; however, it is not known which the best technique is. Short-term follow-up suggest no difference in weight loss or weight regain between them. However, there is no information on these parameters in the long term. Theatre time and cost are other important factors defining the best way to form gastrojejunostomy.

Materials and methods: In a prospective longitudinal cohort study consecutive patients following primary LRYGB were recruited to a bariatric database in a tertiary care centre. Anastomotic technique, diameter, the length of operations and associated costs, weight loss and weight regain were recorded. Patients were followed up for 5 years.

Results: A total of 385 patients with an initial body mass index of 47.1 kg/m2 (35-68) were enrolled to this study. This decreased to 33.3 kg/m2 (21-54 kg/m2) after 5 years. There was no difference in %TWL after 3 years, P = 0.296, or 5 years, P = 0.187, between the techniques. The number of patients with weight regain was not different after 3 years, P = 0.224, or 5 years, P = 0.795. All techniques had similar operative time. CSA has a higher material cost. Early anastomotic stricture was more common following HSA; however, the difference was not significant.

Conclusion: Mid-term weight loss and weight regain are not related to anastomotic technique, and there is no difference in operative time associated to them. Circular stapler technique has a higher material cost due to the additional stapler.

Keywords: Anastomosis size; Anastomotic technique; Gastric bypass; Gastrojejunal anastomosis; Gastrojejunal stoma size; LRYGB; Laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass; Surgical technique; Weight loss; Weight regain.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scatterplot diagram of percentage total and excess weight loss 1 year after surgery. Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA, values are mean ± standard error of mean
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scatterplot diagram of percentage total and excess weight loss 3 years after surgery. Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA, values are mean ± standard error of mean
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Scatterplot diagram of percentage total and excess weight loss 5 years after surgery. Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA, values are mean ± standard error of mean

References

    1. Kyle TK, Dhurandhar EJ, Allison DB. Regarding obesity as a disease: evolving policies and their implications. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2016;45:511–520. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2016.04.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO. Obesity and overweight. https://www.whoint/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight 2019.
    1. Sima E, Hedberg J, Sundbom M. Gastrointestinal symptoms, weight loss and patient satisfaction 5 years after gastric bypass: a study of three techniques for the gastrojejunal anastomosis. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:1553–1558. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4374-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Brien P. Surgical Treatment of Obesity. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al., editors. Endotext. South Dartmouth (MA); 2000.
    1. Doherty C, Benotti P, Butler M, Clare M, Dillinger E, Goodman G, Hess D, Howel L, Mason E, Miller D, Newhoff A, Popoola D, van Nostrand D, Woerz E, Zemel R. Rationale for the surgical treatment of severe obesity. Obes Surg. 1993;3:430–433. doi: 10.1381/096089293765559179. - DOI - PubMed