Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Aug 27;383(9):836-845.
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004736.

A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

A Randomized Trial of Closed-Loop Control in Children with Type 1 Diabetes

Marc D Breton et al. N Engl J Med. .

Abstract

Background: A closed-loop system of insulin delivery (also called an artificial pancreas) may improve glycemic outcomes in children with type 1 diabetes.

Methods: In a 16-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial, we assigned, in a 3:1 ratio, children 6 to 13 years of age who had type 1 diabetes to receive treatment with the use of either a closed-loop system of insulin delivery (closed-loop group) or a sensor-augmented insulin pump (control group). The primary outcome was the percentage of time that the glucose level was in the target range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter, as measured by continuous glucose monitoring.

Results: A total of 101 children underwent randomization (78 to the closed-loop group and 23 to the control group); the glycated hemoglobin levels at baseline ranged from 5.7 to 10.1%. The mean (±SD) percentage of time that the glucose level was in the target range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter increased from 53±17% at baseline to 67±10% (the mean over 16 weeks of treatment) in the closed-loop group and from 51±16% to 55±13% in the control group (mean adjusted difference, 11 percentage points [equivalent to 2.6 hours per day]; 95% confidence interval, 7 to 14; P<0.001). In both groups, the median percentage of time that the glucose level was below 70 mg per deciliter was low (1.6% in the closed-loop group and 1.8% in the control group). In the closed-loop group, the median percentage of time that the system was in the closed-loop mode was 93% (interquartile range, 91 to 95). No episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis or severe hypoglycemia occurred in either group.

Conclusions: In this 16-week trial involving children with type 1 diabetes, the glucose level was in the target range for a greater percentage of time with the use of a closed-loop system than with the use of a sensor-augmented insulin pump. (Funded by Tandem Diabetes Care and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03844789.).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Percentage of Time with the Glucose Level in the Target Range.
Panel A shows a box plot of the percentage of time that the glucose level was in the target range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter (3.9 to 10.0 mmol per liter), as measured by continuous glucose monitoring, during 4-week periods over 4 months among patients who were assigned to receive treatment with either a closed-loop system (closed loop) or a sensor-augmented pump (control). The black dots denote the mean values, the horizontal bars the median values, and the lower and upper boundaries of each box the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively. Panel B shows an envelope plot of the same outcome according to the time of day. The data points denote the hourly median values, and the lower and upper boundary of each shaded region the 25th and 75th percentiles, respectively.

Comment in

References

    1. American Diabetes Association. 13. Children and adolescents: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes–2020. Diabetes Care 2020;43:Suppl 1:S163–S182. - PubMed
    1. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al. State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019;21:66–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeBoer MD, Breton MD, Wakeman C, et al. Performance of an artificial pancreas system for young children with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2017;19:293–8. - PubMed
    1. Hovorka R, Allen JM, Elleri D, et al. Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial. Lancet 2010;375:743–51. - PubMed
    1. Phillip M, Battelino T, Atlas E, et al. Nocturnal glucose control with an artificial pancreas at a diabetes camp. N Engl J Med 2013;368:824–33. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data