Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Aug 3:11:707.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00707. eCollection 2020.

Connectivity of the Frontal Cortical Oscillatory Dynamics Underlying Inhibitory Control During a Go/No-Go Task as a Predictive Biomarker in Major Depression

Affiliations

Connectivity of the Frontal Cortical Oscillatory Dynamics Underlying Inhibitory Control During a Go/No-Go Task as a Predictive Biomarker in Major Depression

Ying-Lin Han et al. Front Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by core functional deficits in cognitive inhibition, which is crucial for emotion regulation. To assess the response to ruminative and negative mood states, it was hypothesized that MDD patients have prolonged disparities in the oscillatory dynamics of the frontal cortical regions across the life course of the disease.

Method: A "go/no-go" response inhibition paradigm was tested in 31 MDD patients and 19 age-matched healthy controls after magnetoencephalography (MEG) scanning. The use of minimum norm estimates (MNE) examined the changes of inhibitory control network which included the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA), and left primary motor cortex (lM1). The power spectrum (PS) within each node and the functional connectivity (FC) between nodes were compared between two groups. Furthermore, Pearson correlation was calculated to estimate the relationship between altered FC and clinical features.

Result: PS was significantly reduced in left motor and preSMA of MDD patients in both beta (13-30 Hz) and low gamma (30-50 Hz) bands. Compared to the HC group, the MDD group demonstrated higher connectivity between lM1 and preSMA in the beta band (t = 3.214, p = 0.002, FDR corrected) and showed reduced connectivity between preSMA and rIFG in the low gamma band (t = -2.612, p = 0.012, FDR corrected). The FC between lM1 and preSMA in the beta band was positively correlated with illness duration (r = 0.475, p = 0.005, FDR corrected), while the FC between preSMA and rIFG in the low gamma band was negatively correlated with illness duration (r = -0.509, p = 0.002, FDR corrected) and retardation factor scores (r = -0.288, p = 0.022, uncorrected).

Conclusion: In this study, a clinical neurophysiological signature of cognitive inhibition leading to sustained negative affect as well as functional non-recovery in MDD patients is highlighted. Duration of illness (DI) plays a key role in negative emotional processing, heighten rumination, impulsivity, and disinhibition.

Keywords: cognitive inhibition; functional connectivity (FC); go/no-go task; magnetoencephalography (MEG); major depressive disorder (MDD); power spectrum (PS).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the experimental background and principal hypothesis. A model of the regions included in the dynamic analysis (rIFG, preSMA, and lM1) and the specified connectivity. Hypothesis: the layerspecific burden of pathology is predicted to disrupt the specific-frequency, attenuate dysfunction in the beta and gamma bands, and consequently impair movement control. Modified from (32).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The procedure of the go/no-go experiment. Go trail (green light): 300 ms/per stimulus, 150 times; No-go trail (green + red light): 150 ms/per stimulus, 50 times; Stimulus Intervals 1,500 ms.
Figure 3
Figure 3
FC among rIFG-preSMA-lM1. Schematic diagram of the FC among the three core brain regions based on response inhibition network; solid lines: the FC in beta band, dotted line: the FC in the low gamma band; red color: MDD's FC > HC's FC, blue color: MDD's FC < HC's FC.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Differences of FC in the beta and low gamma bands at no-go trials. (A): the FC between lM1 and preSMA in the beta band; (B): the FC between lM1 and rIFG in the beta band; (C): the FC between preSMA and rIFG in the low gamma band. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Correlations between FC and clinical information. (A) The FC between lM1 and preSMA in the beta band positively correlated with illness duration; (B) The FC between preSMA and rIFG in the low gamma band negatively correlated with illness duration; (C) The FC between preSMA and rIFG in the low gamma band negatively correlated with retardation factors.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Joormann J, Yoon KL, Zetsche U. Cognitive inhibition in depression. Appl Preventive Psychol (2007) 12(3):128–39. 10.1016/j.appsy.2007.09.002 - DOI
    1. Sheffield JM, Karcher NR, Barch DM. Cognitive Deficits in Psychotic Disorders: A Lifespan Perspective. Neuropsychol Rev (2018) 28(4):509–33. 10.1007/s11065-018-9388-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Atique-Ur-Rehman H, Neill JC. Cognitive dysfunction in major depression: From assessment to novel therapies. Pharmacol Ther (2019) 202:53–71. 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.05.013 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goodwin GM, Martinez-Aran A, Glahn DC, Vieta E. Cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: neurodevelopment or neurodegeneration? An ECNP expert meeting report. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol (2008) 18(11):787–93. 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2008.07.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zuckerman H, Pan Z, Park C, Brietzke E, Musial N, Shariq AS, et al. Recognition and Treatment of Cognitive Dysfunction in Major Depressive Disorder. Front Psychiatry (2018) 9(655). 10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00655 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources