Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Jul 28:11:1126.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01126. eCollection 2020.

Focusing on Mouth Movement to Improve Genuine Smile Recognition

Affiliations

Focusing on Mouth Movement to Improve Genuine Smile Recognition

Qian-Nan Ruan et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Smiles are the most commonly and frequently used facial expressions by human beings. Some scholars claimed that the low accuracy in recognizing genuine smiles is explained by the perceptual-attentional hypothesis, meaning that observers either did not pay attention to responsible cues or were unable to recognize these cues (usually the Duchenne marker or AU6 displaying as contraction of muscles in eye regions). We investigated whether training (instructing participants to pay attention either to the Duchenne mark or to mouth movement) might help improve the recognition of genuine smiles, including accuracy and confidence. Results indicated that attention to mouth movement improves these people's ability to distinguish between genuine and posed smiles, with nullification of the alternative explanations such as sample distribution and intensity of lip pulling (AU12). The generalization of the conclusion requires further investigations. This study further argues that the perceptual-attentional hypothesis can explain smile genuineness recognition.

Keywords: Duchenne marker; dynamic lip; genuine and posed smiles; mouth movement; perceptual-attentional hypothesis; training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Examples from the UvA-NEMO Smile Database (Dibeklioğlu et al., 2012) which was marked as publishable (but the permission is required to use the images), where (A) is a genuine smile and (B) a posed smile, illustrating the difficulty in distinguishing genuine smiles from static images.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Interaction between factor cue and session (1: pre-training; 2: post-training). The error bar indicates the 95% confidence interval.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ambadar Z., Cohn J. F., Reed L. I. (2009). All smiles are not created equal: morphology and timing of smiles perceived as amused, polite, and embarrassed/nervous. J. Nonverbal Behav. 33 17–34. 10.1007/s10919-008-0059-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bachorowski J. A., Owren M. J. (2001). Not all laughs are alike: Voiced but not unvoiced laughter readily elicits positive affect. Psychol. Sci. 12, 252–257. 10.1111/1467-9280.00346 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bolzani Dinehart L. H., Messinger D. S., Acosta S. I., Cassel T., Ambadar Z., Cohn J. (2005). Adult perceptions of positive and negative infant emotional expressions. Infancy 8 279–303. 10.1207/s15327078in0803_5 - DOI
    1. Bond C. F. (2008). Commentary a few can catch a liar, sometimes: comments on Ekman and O’Sullivan (1991), as well as Ekman. O’Sullivan, and Frank (1999). Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 22 1298–1300. 10.1002/acp.1475 - DOI
    1. Boraston Z. L., Corden B., Miles L. K., Skuse D. H., Blakemore S.-J. (2008). Brief report: perception of spontaneous and posed smiles by individuals with autism. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 38 574–580. 10.1007/s10803-007-0421-1 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources